1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE.HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR RFA NO 100510 OF 2022 BETWEEN 1 . SMT. AKKAMMA D/O HANUMAPPA BATAKURKI ALIAS BATAGURKI URF SMT. LALITAWWA W/O SHIVAMURTHYAPPA GANIGER AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. PUTAGAON, BADNI, TQ. SHIRAHATTI, NOW RESIDING AT BHUVIRAPUR, TQ. AND DIST. HAVERI 581110. AND OTHERS. APPELLANT (By Sri. : V G BHAT, Advocate ) AND 1 . MUTTAPPA S/O SHARANAPPA MUGALI ALIAS GANIGER ALIAS ARAMANI AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. NEAR VEERANARAYAN TEMPLE, GADAG, TQ. AND DSIT. GADAG 582102. AND OTHERS. ... RESPONDENT 2 RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.09.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.62/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GADAG PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R S Three weeks time is granted to comply with office objections. Otherwise, matter stands dismissed without reference to Court. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 19.12.2023. The advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections at SI No.1 to 8. Hence, this RFA No. 100510/2022 stands dismissed without reference to Court as per the Court Order dated 17.11.2023. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. C- By:- rv T- By: -ran

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE.HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR RFA NO 100510 OF 2022 BETWEEN 1 . SMT. AKKAMMA D/O HANUMAPPA BATAKURKI ALIAS BATAGURKI URF SMT. LALITAWWA W/O SHIVAMURTHYAPPA GANIGER AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. PUTAGAON, BADNI, TQ. SHIRAHATTI, NOW RESIDING AT BHUVIRAPUR, TQ. AND DIST. HAVERI 581110. AND OTHERS. APPELLANT (By Sri. : V G BHAT, Advocate ) AND 1 . MUTTAPPA S/O SHARANAPPA MUGALI ALIAS GANIGER ALIAS ARAMANI AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. NEAR VEERANARAYAN TEMPLE, GADAG, TQ. AND DSIT. GADAG 582102. AND OTHERS. ... RESPONDENT 2 RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.09.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.62/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GADAG PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R S Three weeks time is granted to comply with office objections. Otherwise, matter stands dismissed without reference to Court. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 19.12.2023. The advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections at SI No.1 to 8. Hence, this RFA No. 100510/2022 stands dismissed without reference to Court as per the Court Order dated 17.11.2023. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. C- By:- rv T- By: -ran