- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:45017 MFA No. 8597 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010756972024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8597 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI S.A KUSHAL KUMAR AGED MAJOR, 2. MR. S.A. MAHINDRA AGED MAJOR, BOTH ARE SONS OF S.N. ANANDA MURTHY, R/A NO.15, SAMPIGE HALLI VILLAGE ,J AKKUR POST BANGALORE - 560 064. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B. VACHAN.,ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR 1. MR B.NAGARAJ SUBRAMANYA GUPTA S/O. LATE BACHANNA, SREENATH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, Location: HIGH R/A. HOODI VILLAGE, COURT OF KARNATAKA K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 048. SMT. MUNIYAMMA, W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, (SINCE DEAD, REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 WHO IS THE SON OF LATE MUNIYAMMA) - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:45017 MFA No. 8597 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010756972024 2. MR. RAJANNA S/O. LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 3. MR. R. MOHAN KUMAR S/O. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 4. SRI. R. THRISHUL S/O. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESPONDNETS NOS.2 TO 4 ARE R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BANGALOR DISTRICT-560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUHAS. S., ADV. FOR C/R1 SRI. R.SHAILESH KUMAR FOR C/R3) THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT.21.09.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.12 IN O.S.NO.4877/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDITIONAL

CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, (CCH- 31), REJECTING IA NO.12 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:45017 MFA No. 8597 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010756972024 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. 2. The memo is accepted. The plaint has been rejected by the trial Court 3. In view of the rejection of the plaint, the present appeal would not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:45017 MFA No. 8597 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010756972024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8597 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI S.A KUSHAL KUMAR AGED MAJOR, 2. MR. S.A. MAHINDRA AGED MAJOR, BOTH ARE SONS OF S.N. ANANDA MURTHY, R/A NO.15, SAMPIGE HALLI VILLAGE ,J AKKUR POST BANGALORE - 560 064. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B. VACHAN.,ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR 1. MR B.NAGARAJ SUBRAMANYA GUPTA S/O. LATE BACHANNA, SREENATH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, Location: HIGH R/A. HOODI VILLAGE, COURT OF KARNATAKA K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 048. SMT. MUNIYAMMA, W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, (SINCE DEAD, REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 WHO IS THE SON OF LATE MUNIYAMMA) - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:45017 MFA No. 8597 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010756972024 2. MR. RAJANNA S/O. LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 3. MR. R. MOHAN KUMAR S/O. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 4. SRI. R. THRISHUL S/O. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESPONDNETS NOS.2 TO 4 ARE R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BANGALOR DISTRICT-560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUHAS. S., ADV. FOR C/R1 SRI. R.SHAILESH KUMAR FOR C/R3) THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT.21.09.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.12 IN O.S.NO.4877/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDITIONAL

CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, (CCH- 31), REJECTING IA NO.12 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:45017 MFA No. 8597 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010756972024 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. 2. The memo is accepted. The plaint has been rejected by the trial Court 3. In view of the rejection of the plaint, the present appeal would not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8