Karnataka High Court
Sri Raju M v. Smt Manjula
2025:KHC:31981 · CRP/835/2025
- Decision date
- 2026-08-18
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Lalitha Kanneganti
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:31981 WP No. 19051 of 2025 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 19051 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI RAJU M S/O LATE SRI. MUDDAVEERAPAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/A NO. 1196, 22ND 'A' MAIN, 11TH CROSS, SECTOR-1, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU 560 102 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAN S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT MANJULA D/O LATE SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, W/O SRI. BASAVARAJU AGED ABOURT 40 YEARS, Digitally signed R/A THIGALARAPALYA, by NAGAVENI HAMLET OF ESUVANAHALLI, Location: High DODDABELE POST, Court of THYAMAGUNDALU HOBLI, Karnataka NELMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT- 562132. 2. SRI. GANGAIAH H. S/O LATE SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 3. SMT. MADHURA T.V. W/O GANGANNA H @ GANGAIAH H AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:31981 WP No. 19051 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19-04-2025 PASSED ON I.A NO.2 IN O.S. NO. 857/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION I.A NO.2 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 (A) AND (D) OF CPC AND REJECT THE PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER
The petitioner calls in question the rejection of an application under Order VII Rule 11 (a) and (d) of Code of Civil Procedure. The order is revisable and not to be challenged in petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the petitioner is permitted to convert the subject proceedings to a civil revision petition. 2. For statistical purpose, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 290 Page No.02 is retyped and replaced vide chamber order dated 18.10.2025