Karnataka High Court
Smt Rathnamma v. Mysore Zilla Mahila Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, Mysore
2026:KHC:40528 · WP/22268/2023
- Decision date
- 2026-08-03
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Jyoti M
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40528 WP No. 22268 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010521832023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 22268 OF 2023 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SMT. RATHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, W/O. VEERABHADRASWAMY, DOOR NO. 424/B, 22ND MAIN, 2ND STAGE, J.P. NAGAR, MYSURU-570025. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.PRASANNA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: MYSORE ZILLA MAHILA SAHAKARA BANK, NIYAMITHA, MYSORE, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT Digitally signed by SAHAKARA SANKEERNA, PREMCHANDRA M R SAHAKARA BHAVANA PREMISES, Location: HIGH CHAMARAJA DOUBLE ROAD,COURT OF KARNATAKA MYSORE-570 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. H.VINAY JADAV, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S.MAHENDRA, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40528 WP No. 22268 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010521832023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.K.Prasanna Shetty, counsel for the petitioner and Sri.H.Vinay Jadav, counsel on behalf of Sri.B.S.Mahendra, for the respondent appeared in person.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo along with the affidavit of the petitioner is filed seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. Upon a specific query by the Court, counsel submits that the decision to withdraw the petition has been taken consciously and voluntarily, and that the petitioner shall not seek review, recall, or modification of the order passed on the basis of such withdrawal. Counsel for the respondent submits that the loan amount has already been discharged and, therefore, has no objection to the withdrawal of the writ petition. The submissions made by the counsel for the respective parties and the memo are placed on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40528 WP No. 22268 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010521832023 In view of the categorical submission made by the counsel for the petitioner that the decision to withdraw the petition is conscious and voluntary, and there being no objection from the respondent, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE ss List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1