Karnataka High Court
Smt. Najamunisa Madarsab Mannur v. Belagavi Urban Development Authority
MFA/101396/2017
- Decision date
- 2026-08-01
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Geetha K. B., Geetha K. B
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:17607 MFA No. 101396 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101396/2017 (LAC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAJAMUNISA MADARSAB MANNUR, SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 1A. SMT. PARVIN MANSUR DEVALAPUR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: HIREBAGEWADI, TALUK AND DISTRICT BELAGAVI. 1B. SRI MOHAMMED ALI MADARSAB MANNUR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: TANAJI GALLI, MAJAGAON, TALUK AND DISTRICT BELAGAVI. 1C. SRI AIJAZ MADARSAB MANNUR, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: HO. NO. 243, TANAJI GALLI, MAJAGAON, Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR TALUK AND DISTRICT BELAGAVI. LAXMAN KATTIMANI …APPELLANTS Location: High Court of Karnataka (BY SRI Y. LAKSHMIKANT REDDY AND SRI Y. MALATHI REDDY, ADVOCATES) AND: THE COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BELAGAVI – 590 019. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894, PRAYING TO, AWARDING A COMPENSATION OF RS.97,000/- PER GUNTA IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND MODIFY THE - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:17607 MFA No. 101396 of 2017 JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 26.04.2016 PASSED IN LAC 26/2012 BY THE LEARNED 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, BELAGAVI AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA) The above appeal was listed on 16.10.2017, 22.01.2018, 02.08.2019, 29.11.2019, 07.04.2021, 19.07.2022 and 05.12.2023 for compliance of office objections. However, the office objections have not been complied. 2. This Court vide order dated 19.07.2022 granted a week’s time to comply with the office objections, failing which, the matter was ordered to be listed for dismissal. However, vide order dated 05.12.2023, this Court granted one week time to comply with the office objections. Till date office objections have not been complied with. Hence, the above matter has been listed this day. 3. Even today, the matter was passed over in the morning session and the learned counsel was permitted to comply with the office objections and the matter was called in - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:17607 MFA No. 101396 of 2017 the afternoon session. However, the office objections have not been complied with. 4. Having regard to the order dated 19.07.2022, the above appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE PMP/CT-ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2