- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40284 WP No. 3568 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010077802023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 3568 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT S N VIMALAMMA WIFE OF LATE B.V. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.718, VENKATESHWARA NILAYA, KRISHNA TALKIES ROAD, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK - 562 101. 2. SRI S RANGASWAMY SON OF SRI VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT VENKATALA GRAMA, YELAHANKA POST, Digitally signed by BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, CHAYA S A BENGALURU - 560 064. Location: HIGH COURT OF …PETITIONERS KARNATAKA (BY SRI. KESHAVA MURTHY M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101. 2. The ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40284 WP No. 3568 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010077802023 3. THE TAHSILDAR CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101. 4. SRI NANJUNDA @ NANJUNDAIAH SON OF LATE SEETHALAKSHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 5. SRI BALASUBRAMANIYAM SON OF LATE SEETHALAKSHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT KANDAKANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK - 562 101. 6. SRI. K.S. VYDYANATHAN @ VYDYANATHAN SON OF LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.306, LIG, 707 CHS, 4TH PHASE, 4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,

BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. SRIKANTA SHARMA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE OFFICE OF THE R-1 TO 3 PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12/12/2022 PASSED BY THE R- 1 IN CASE NO.RA/34/2021-2022 AT ANNEXURE-A AND THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05/04/2022 PASSED BY THE R-2 IN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40284 WP No. 3568 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010077802023 CASE NOS. RA NO. (CHIKKA) 38/2014-2015 AND RA (CHIKKA) NO.438/2015-2016 AT ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 12.12.2022 passed in RA/34/2021-22 by respondent No.1 (Annexure A) and order dated 05.04.2021 passed in RA No.(Chikka)38/2014-2015 and RA (Chikka) No.438/2015-2016 by respondent No.2 (Annexure B). 2. Heard Sri. Keshava Murthy M., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned HCGP appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri. Srikanta Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5. 3. On careful consideration of the findings recorded by both the authorities would indicate that, the petitioners herein had not produced any relevant material as to the grant made - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40284 WP No. 3568 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010077802023

by the respondents-State in favour of the petitioners. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 4. However, it is open for the petitioners to establish their right over the property in question and thereafter, approach the competent authority for the entry in the revenue records. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40284 WP No. 3568 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010077802023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 3568 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT S N VIMALAMMA WIFE OF LATE B.V. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.718, VENKATESHWARA NILAYA, KRISHNA TALKIES ROAD, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK - 562 101. 2. SRI S RANGASWAMY SON OF SRI VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT VENKATALA GRAMA, YELAHANKA POST, Digitally signed by BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, CHAYA S A BENGALURU - 560 064. Location: HIGH COURT OF …PETITIONERS KARNATAKA (BY SRI. KESHAVA MURTHY M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101. 2. The ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40284 WP No. 3568 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010077802023 3. THE TAHSILDAR CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101. 4. SRI NANJUNDA @ NANJUNDAIAH SON OF LATE SEETHALAKSHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 5. SRI BALASUBRAMANIYAM SON OF LATE SEETHALAKSHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT KANDAKANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK - 562 101. 6. SRI. K.S. VYDYANATHAN @ VYDYANATHAN SON OF LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.306, LIG, 707 CHS, 4TH PHASE, 4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,

BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. SRIKANTA SHARMA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE OFFICE OF THE R-1 TO 3 PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12/12/2022 PASSED BY THE R- 1 IN CASE NO.RA/34/2021-2022 AT ANNEXURE-A AND THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05/04/2022 PASSED BY THE R-2 IN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40284 WP No. 3568 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010077802023 CASE NOS. RA NO. (CHIKKA) 38/2014-2015 AND RA (CHIKKA) NO.438/2015-2016 AT ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 12.12.2022 passed in RA/34/2021-22 by respondent No.1 (Annexure A) and order dated 05.04.2021 passed in RA No.(Chikka)38/2014-2015 and RA (Chikka) No.438/2015-2016 by respondent No.2 (Annexure B). 2. Heard Sri. Keshava Murthy M., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned HCGP appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri. Srikanta Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5. 3. On careful consideration of the findings recorded by both the authorities would indicate that, the petitioners herein had not produced any relevant material as to the grant made - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:40284 WP No. 3568 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010077802023

by the respondents-State in favour of the petitioners. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 4. However, it is open for the petitioners to establish their right over the property in question and thereafter, approach the competent authority for the entry in the revenue records. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5