- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4969 OF 2017 (MV-D) C/W MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO. 114 OF 2019 (MV-D) IN MFA No. 4969/2017: BETWEEN: THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE NEAR DOOM LIGHT CIRCLE KOLAR,REPT. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER BANGALORE REGIONAL OFFICE 144,SUBHARAM COMPLEX, M.G ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. …APPELLANT Digitally signed (BY SRI. SRINIVASA K N., ADVOCATE) by PADMASHREE AND: SHEKHAR DESAI 1. SMT. BHAGYAMMA Location: High W/O SRI ANJINAPPA, Court of AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS Karnataka 2. SRI. ANJINAPPA S/O LATE SRI GIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT BETTAHOSAPURA KOLAR TALUK. - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 3. SRI. L. KANNAN S/O V G LAKSHMANA MUDALIYAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.104/5,GAJARAJA MUDALI STREET, THOTTAPALAYAM,VELLORE VELLORE DISTRICT TAMILNADU STATE-632 004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N. GOPALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 18.01.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.151/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AND MACT, KOLAR, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.13,27,144/-WITH INTEREST AT 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION.

IN MFA.CROB NO. 114/2019: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BHAGYAMMA W/O SRI. ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 2. SRI. ANJINAPPA S/O LATE SRI. GIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT BETTAHOSAPURA KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT. ...CROSS OBJECTORS (BY SRI. GOPAL KRISHNA N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE NEAR DOOM LIGHT CIRCLE KOLAR-563 101,. BY ITS MANAGER. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 2. SRI L KANNAN S/O V G LAKSHMANA MUDALIYAR AGED: MAJOR, R/AT NO.104/5, GAJARAJA MUDALI STREET, THOTTAPALAYAM, VELLORE DISTRICT TAMILNADU STATE-632 004. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.N. SRINIVASA., ADVOCATE FOR R1, V/O DTD:30.07.2026 NOTICE TO R2 IS D/W) THIS MFA CROB IN MFA NO.4969/2017 PASSED U/O.41 RULE 22(1) OF CPC R/W SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.18.01.2017 PASSED ON MVC NO.151/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, MACT, KOLAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MFA AND MFA CROB COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT MFA No.4969/2017 is filed by the appellant/Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging the judgment and award dated 18.01.2017 passed on MVC No.151/2015 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM, MACT, Kolar. - 4 -

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 2. MFA CROB.No.114/2019 is filed by the appellant/claimants under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to modify the judgment and award dated 18.01.2017 passed on MVC No.151/2015 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM, MACT, Kolar, and for enhancing the compensation. 3. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.1. The ranks of the parties are retained as per tribunal for the sake of convenience. 4. One Subramani met with an accident on 23.12.2014 and died subsequently. His parents filed claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.30,00,000/-. The Tribunal considering the entire evidence on record granted an amount of Rs.13,27,144/- along with interest rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition. 5. Aggrieved by the said order MFA No.4969/2017 is filed by Insurance Company and they stated that - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017

Subramani was bachelor, was aged 23 years at the time of the accident and 50% is to be deducted towards personal expenses, but the Tribunal erred in deducting one third of the same. It was stated that he was a painter, supervisor and working with different employers, but he failed to examine the employer. The Tribunal erred in taking the income as Rs.8,000/- per month which is on higher side. The Tribunal granted excessive amounts under the other heads. Therefore, requested for modification of the judgment. 6. In MFA CROB No.114/2019, by the claimants for enhancement of the compensation, they stated that he was aged 23 years. Though he was getting a fixed salary, Tribunal has taken notional income and 40% is to be added towards future prospects and thus they requested for enhancement of the compensation. 7. Heard the arguments of both sides. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017

8. Though it is stated that Subramani was a painter by profession and earning Rs.15,000/- per month he has not filed any income proof. As he met with an accident in the year 2014, this Court finds that it is reasonable to pay his notional income as Rs.8,500/- per month, as per the chart prepared by Karnataka State Legal Services Authority. He was aged 25 years and the relevant multiplier is ‘18’. As per the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Others reported in (2017)16 SCC 680, the petitioner is entitled for 40% towards future prospects and as he is a bachelor therefore, 50% is to be deducted towards personal expenses. Hence, loss of dependency comes to Rs. 8,500 + 40% x 12 x 18 - 50% = Rs.12,85,200/-. Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are entitled for fililial consortium of Rs.40,000/- each towards and they are also entitled for Rs.30,000/- under the Conventional heads. - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 9. Thus in all, components awarded by this court are as below, Amount Sl.Nos. Particulars in Rs. 1 Towards loss of dependency 12,85,200 2 Towards loss of consortium 80,000 3 Conventional heads 30,000 Total 13,95,200 Hence, the compensation granted by tribunal is enhanced from Rs.13,27,114/- to Rs.13,95,220/- along with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. 10. In the result, the following order is passed: ORDER

i. Both appeals are allowed in part. ii. The judgment and award 18.01.2017 passed on MVC No.151/2015 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM, MACT, Kolar, is modified. - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 iii. The claimants are entitled to a sum of Rs.13,95,220/- along with interest at 6% p.a., from the date of petition till the date of realization, instead of Rs.13,27,114/-granted by the tribunal. iv. It is stated that insurance company has not deposited any compensation. They are directed to deposit Rs.13,95,200/- along With interest at the rate of 6% within 1 month from the date of the order. v. On such deposit, both petitioners are permitted to withdraw the entire amount along with interest accrued on the same, equally. - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 vi. On 30.07.2026, the delay of 447 days is condoned by this Court on the condition that the claimant will not be entitled for the interest in case of enhancement. Hence, Insurance Company is not liable to pay the interest for the delayed period. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE AKV CT:NR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4969 OF 2017 (MV-D) C/W MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO. 114 OF 2019 (MV-D) IN MFA No. 4969/2017: BETWEEN: THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE NEAR DOOM LIGHT CIRCLE KOLAR,REPT. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER BANGALORE REGIONAL OFFICE 144,SUBHARAM COMPLEX, M.G ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. …APPELLANT Digitally signed (BY SRI. SRINIVASA K N., ADVOCATE) by PADMASHREE AND: SHEKHAR DESAI 1. SMT. BHAGYAMMA Location: High W/O SRI ANJINAPPA, Court of AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS Karnataka 2. SRI. ANJINAPPA S/O LATE SRI GIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT BETTAHOSAPURA KOLAR TALUK. - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 3. SRI. L. KANNAN S/O V G LAKSHMANA MUDALIYAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.104/5,GAJARAJA MUDALI STREET, THOTTAPALAYAM,VELLORE VELLORE DISTRICT TAMILNADU STATE-632 004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N. GOPALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 18.01.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.151/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AND MACT, KOLAR, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.13,27,144/-WITH INTEREST AT 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION.

IN MFA.CROB NO. 114/2019: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BHAGYAMMA W/O SRI. ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 2. SRI. ANJINAPPA S/O LATE SRI. GIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT BETTAHOSAPURA KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT. ...CROSS OBJECTORS (BY SRI. GOPAL KRISHNA N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE NEAR DOOM LIGHT CIRCLE KOLAR-563 101,. BY ITS MANAGER. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 2. SRI L KANNAN S/O V G LAKSHMANA MUDALIYAR AGED: MAJOR, R/AT NO.104/5, GAJARAJA MUDALI STREET, THOTTAPALAYAM, VELLORE DISTRICT TAMILNADU STATE-632 004. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.N. SRINIVASA., ADVOCATE FOR R1, V/O DTD:30.07.2026 NOTICE TO R2 IS D/W) THIS MFA CROB IN MFA NO.4969/2017 PASSED U/O.41 RULE 22(1) OF CPC R/W SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.18.01.2017 PASSED ON MVC NO.151/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, MACT, KOLAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MFA AND MFA CROB COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT MFA No.4969/2017 is filed by the appellant/Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging the judgment and award dated 18.01.2017 passed on MVC No.151/2015 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM, MACT, Kolar. - 4 -

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 2. MFA CROB.No.114/2019 is filed by the appellant/claimants under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to modify the judgment and award dated 18.01.2017 passed on MVC No.151/2015 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM, MACT, Kolar, and for enhancing the compensation. 3. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.1. The ranks of the parties are retained as per tribunal for the sake of convenience. 4. One Subramani met with an accident on 23.12.2014 and died subsequently. His parents filed claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.30,00,000/-. The Tribunal considering the entire evidence on record granted an amount of Rs.13,27,144/- along with interest rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition. 5. Aggrieved by the said order MFA No.4969/2017 is filed by Insurance Company and they stated that - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017

Subramani was bachelor, was aged 23 years at the time of the accident and 50% is to be deducted towards personal expenses, but the Tribunal erred in deducting one third of the same. It was stated that he was a painter, supervisor and working with different employers, but he failed to examine the employer. The Tribunal erred in taking the income as Rs.8,000/- per month which is on higher side. The Tribunal granted excessive amounts under the other heads. Therefore, requested for modification of the judgment. 6. In MFA CROB No.114/2019, by the claimants for enhancement of the compensation, they stated that he was aged 23 years. Though he was getting a fixed salary, Tribunal has taken notional income and 40% is to be added towards future prospects and thus they requested for enhancement of the compensation. 7. Heard the arguments of both sides. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017

8. Though it is stated that Subramani was a painter by profession and earning Rs.15,000/- per month he has not filed any income proof. As he met with an accident in the year 2014, this Court finds that it is reasonable to pay his notional income as Rs.8,500/- per month, as per the chart prepared by Karnataka State Legal Services Authority. He was aged 25 years and the relevant multiplier is ‘18’. As per the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Others reported in (2017)16 SCC 680, the petitioner is entitled for 40% towards future prospects and as he is a bachelor therefore, 50% is to be deducted towards personal expenses. Hence, loss of dependency comes to Rs. 8,500 + 40% x 12 x 18 - 50% = Rs.12,85,200/-. Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are entitled for fililial consortium of Rs.40,000/- each towards and they are also entitled for Rs.30,000/- under the Conventional heads. - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 9. Thus in all, components awarded by this court are as below, Amount Sl.Nos. Particulars in Rs. 1 Towards loss of dependency 12,85,200 2 Towards loss of consortium 80,000 3 Conventional heads 30,000 Total 13,95,200 Hence, the compensation granted by tribunal is enhanced from Rs.13,27,114/- to Rs.13,95,220/- along with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. 10. In the result, the following order is passed: ORDER

i. Both appeals are allowed in part. ii. The judgment and award 18.01.2017 passed on MVC No.151/2015 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM, MACT, Kolar, is modified. - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 iii. The claimants are entitled to a sum of Rs.13,95,220/- along with interest at 6% p.a., from the date of petition till the date of realization, instead of Rs.13,27,114/-granted by the tribunal. iv. It is stated that insurance company has not deposited any compensation. They are directed to deposit Rs.13,95,200/- along With interest at the rate of 6% within 1 month from the date of the order. v. On such deposit, both petitioners are permitted to withdraw the entire amount along with interest accrued on the same, equally. - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:39954 MFA No. 4969 of 2017 C/W MFA.CROB No. 114 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010362252017 vi. On 30.07.2026, the delay of 447 days is condoned by this Court on the condition that the claimant will not be entitled for the interest in case of enhancement. Hence, Insurance Company is not liable to pay the interest for the delayed period. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE AKV CT:NR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4