Karnataka High Court
Smt. Anithalakshmi v. State of Karnataka
2026:KHC:37235 · CRL.P/2976/2024
- Decision date
- 2026-07-20
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- M. Nagaprasanna
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:37235 CRL.P No. 2976 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010165082024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2976 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ANITHALAKSHMI W/O NANDISH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT CHAMUNDIPURA SANJEEVINI LAYOUT RAMANAGARA TOWN RAMANAGARA 562 159 2. NANDISH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT CHAMUNDIPURA SANJEEVINI LAYOUT Digitally RAMANAGARA TOWN signed by RAMANAGARA 562 159PADMAVATHI B K …PETITIONERSLocation: High Court of (BY SRI: JAYARAMU S K.,ADVOCATE)Karnataka AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY IJOOR POLICE STATION RAMANGARA TOWN REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:37235 CRL.P No. 2976 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010165082024 2. SONY M S W/O MANJUNATH K AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT NO. 105, 2nd CROSS BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR NEAR RAYARADODDI WARD NO.27 MAGADI ROAD RAMANAGARA TOWN RAMANAGARA 562 159 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT: RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDE SECTION 482 CR.P.C BY THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.89/2023 DATED 15.07.2022 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 406, 420, 504, 506 READ WITH 34 OF IPC OF IJOOR POLICE, RAMANAGARA TOWN ANNEXURE-A, WHICH IS NOW PENDING BEFORE THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., RAMANAGARA. THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2024, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on seven occasions. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:37235 CRL.P No. 2976 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010165082024 2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the petitioners to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 72