- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36967 MFA No. 2381 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010077632019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2381 OF 2019(MV-I) BETWEEN: JAYARAJ , S/O. SMT. PREMALATHA, AGE 11 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER: SMT. PREMALATHA, W/O. PUSHPARAJ, AGE 44 YEARS, R/AT 68, CR COLONY, IVERNADU VILLAGE, SULLIA TALUK, Digitally signed by DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 239. PADMASHREE …APPELLANT SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High (BY SRI.JAYARAJ - APPELLANT) Court of Karnataka AND: 1. JANARDHANA GOWDA, S/O. DERANNA GOWDA, NOW AGED 61 YEARS, R/O. HONNEPPADY HOUSE, YEDAMANGILA VILLAGE, SULLIA TALUK, - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36967 MFA No. 2381 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010077632019 DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 239. 2. THE MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, PRABHU BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, OPP. ARUNA THEATER MAIN ROAD, PUTTUR, PUTTUR TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.P.B.RAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 29.05.2024) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 11.08.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.216/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MACT, SULLIA, DAKSHINA KANNADA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36967 MFA No. 2381 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010077632019 Learned counsel for respondent No.2 is present. This appeal is filed by the injured claimant for enhancement of compensation but the appellant has not turned up. Court notice is issued to the appellant and the same returned with an endorsement 'appellants not found, left the address'. Even after issuance of notice, he could not be traced and thus, no purpose will be served in continuing the appeal as he failed in prosecuting the appeal for enhancement of compensation, with the diligence. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36967 MFA No. 2381 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010077632019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2381 OF 2019(MV-I) BETWEEN: JAYARAJ , S/O. SMT. PREMALATHA, AGE 11 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER: SMT. PREMALATHA, W/O. PUSHPARAJ, AGE 44 YEARS, R/AT 68, CR COLONY, IVERNADU VILLAGE, SULLIA TALUK, Digitally signed by DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 239. PADMASHREE …APPELLANT SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High (BY SRI.JAYARAJ - APPELLANT) Court of Karnataka AND: 1. JANARDHANA GOWDA, S/O. DERANNA GOWDA, NOW AGED 61 YEARS, R/O. HONNEPPADY HOUSE, YEDAMANGILA VILLAGE, SULLIA TALUK, - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36967 MFA No. 2381 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010077632019 DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 239. 2. THE MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, PRABHU BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, OPP. ARUNA THEATER MAIN ROAD, PUTTUR, PUTTUR TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.P.B.RAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 29.05.2024) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 11.08.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.216/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MACT, SULLIA, DAKSHINA KANNADA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36967 MFA No. 2381 of 2019 CNR: KAHC010077632019 Learned counsel for respondent No.2 is present. This appeal is filed by the injured claimant for enhancement of compensation but the appellant has not turned up. Court notice is issued to the appellant and the same returned with an endorsement 'appellants not found, left the address'. Even after issuance of notice, he could not be traced and thus, no purpose will be served in continuing the appeal as he failed in prosecuting the appeal for enhancement of compensation, with the diligence. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1