Karnataka High Court
Malathi Girish v. Ramasanjeevaiah
2026:KHC:36574-DB · CCC/289/2024
- Decision date
- 2026-07-16
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Anu Sivaraman, Venkatesh Naik T
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36574-DB CCC No. 289 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010149622024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.289 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MALATHI GIRISH W/O H.D. GIRISH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, HOUSE NO.56, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. AMIT A. MANDGI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by AND: PAVITHRA N Location: High Court 1. RAMASANJEEVAIAH of Karnataka THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, YELAHANKA SUB DIVISION, BANGALORE-560063 …ACCUSED 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36574-DB CCC No. 289 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010149622024 M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU- 560001, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAHUL CARIYAPPA K.S., AGA FOR PROFORMA R2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HIS WILFUL AND DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 04.10.2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.24716/2022 WHICH IS CONFIRMED BY THE DIVISION BENCH ON 04.12.2023 IN W.A. NO.1426/2023 AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36574-DB CCC No. 289 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010149622024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the directions contained in the order have been complied with and that nothing survives for consideration in the contempt proceedings. 2. The said submission is recorded. 3. Accordingly, the Contempt proceedings are dropped. Notice, if any, shall stand discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE RAK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 2