- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36395 RFA No. 947 of 2016 CNR: KAHC010320112016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 947 OF 2016 (INJ) BETWEEN: SHRI. G.N. SATISH S/O LATE NARASIMHAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 238/1, 4TH MAIN, KHB COLONY, 1ST STAGE, AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 079. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SRINIVAS K.B.S, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: Digitally SMT. SAVITHA Msigned by V MANJUSHA WIFE OF SRI. MANJUNATH A BAI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,Location: HIGH COURT RESIDING AT NO. 28, 4TH CROSS, OF G.M.PALYA, NEW TIPPASANDRA,KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 075. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NAGARAJA KUMBLE, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.02.2016 PASSED IS OS.NO.3080/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36395 RFA No. 947 of 2016 CNR: KAHC010320112016 AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR MANDATORY INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Even on the last date of occasion, the learned counsel for the appellant remained absent. The appeal is of the year 2016. It appears that the appellant is not interesting in prosecuting the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36395 RFA No. 947 of 2016 CNR: KAHC010320112016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 947 OF 2016 (INJ) BETWEEN: SHRI. G.N. SATISH S/O LATE NARASIMHAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 238/1, 4TH MAIN, KHB COLONY, 1ST STAGE, AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 079. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SRINIVAS K.B.S, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: Digitally SMT. SAVITHA Msigned by V MANJUSHA WIFE OF SRI. MANJUNATH A BAI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,Location: HIGH COURT RESIDING AT NO. 28, 4TH CROSS, OF G.M.PALYA, NEW TIPPASANDRA,KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 075. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NAGARAJA KUMBLE, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.02.2016 PASSED IS OS.NO.3080/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36395 RFA No. 947 of 2016 CNR: KAHC010320112016 AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR MANDATORY INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Even on the last date of occasion, the learned counsel for the appellant remained absent. The appeal is of the year 2016. It appears that the appellant is not interesting in prosecuting the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12