- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:35938 WP No. 31823 of 2025 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 31823 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: P. SRIDHAR KAMATH S/O RATHNAKAR KAMATH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT SUDHA RATHNA OPPOSITE REGAL NXT ADI UDUPI, UDUPI - 576 103 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY G.., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHIEF ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY ZONE KR CIRCLE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION'LJLWDOO\ VLJQHG E\ 6+:(7+$ SHIMOGGA-577 202.5$*+$9(1'5$ /RFDWLRQ +,*+ &2857 2) .$51$7$.$ 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGH DIVISION SHRINGERI - 577 139. 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT UDUPI-576 101. 5. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ZILLA PANCHAYATH, RAJATADRI MANIPAL-576 104. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:35938 WP No. 31823 of 2025 HC-KAR 6. THE COMMISSIONER UDUPI TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ADI UDUPI, UDUPI-576 101. 7. THE COMMISSIONER UDUPI CITY MUNICIPALITY K.M.MARG, UDUPI - 576 101. 8. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDA DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 9. KRISHNA KOTIAN S/O THIMMAPPA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT THIMMAPPA HOTEL ADI UDUPI, UDUPI - 576 103. 10. PRASHANT SUVARNA S/O KESHAV SUVARNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT OPPOSITE REGAL NXT ADI UDUPI, UDUPI - 576 103 …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFAR SHAJ, AGA FOR R1 TO R4 AND R8: V/O DATED:24.11.2025 SRI. ASHOK N NAYAK.,ADVOCATE FOR R5: SRI K PRASAD HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R6: SRI T.I. ABDULLA, ADVOCATE FOR R7: SRI. NAGARAJ KRAPAKAR, HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R9 &R10) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAINING RESPONDENT NO. 9 AND 10 FROM PUTTING UP ANY CONSTRUCTION IN LAND AT SURVEY NO. 9/5 OF MOODANIDAMBURU VILLAGE, TALUK AND DISTRICT UDUPI, ABUTTING N.H. 169-A WITHIN THE PROHIBITORY DISTANCE OF 40 METERS FROM THE CENTER OF N.H. 169-A AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:35938 WP No. 31823 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: (a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ restraining Respondent No. 9 and 10 from putting up any in land at survey No. 9/5 of construction Moodanidamburu Village, Taluk and District Udupi, abutting N.H. 169-A within the prohibitory distance of 40 meters from WKH FHQWHU RI 1 Ƭ -Ƨ

(b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ directing the Respondent No.1 to 8 to consider the representation dated 25-08-2025, dated 17-09-2025 produced at Annexure J and K and the legal notice dated 24-09-2025 produced consequently restrain Respondent no. 9 and 10 from putting up construction in land at survey No. 9/5 of Moodanidamburu Village, Taluk and District Udupi at Annexure M. (c) Issue any other writ or directions to meet the ends of justice. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.7 may sanction a plan or consider an application filed by respondent Nos.9 and 10 without considering the representations of the petitioner dated 25.08.2025 and - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:35938 WP No. 31823 of 2025 HC-KAR 17.09.2025 at Annexures J and K, respectively, as also the legal notice dated 24.09.2025 at Annexure M. 3. The reason for the same is that, according to the petitioner, no construction can be carried out within the building line of the National Highway, and it is in that background that objections have been submitted by the petitioner. 4. At present the claim of the petitioner is hypothetical inasmuch as the application, if any filed by respondent Nos.9 and 10 is yet to be considered by respondent No.7. Hence, by directing respondent No.7 to consider the aforesaid representations of the petitioner while considering any application if filed by respondent Nos.9 and 10, the petition stands disposed.

5. Until grant of such permission by respondent No.7, respondent Nos.9 and 10 are restrained from putting up any construction or carrying out any construction in subject property. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57

- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:35938 WP No. 31823 of 2025 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 31823 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: P. SRIDHAR KAMATH S/O RATHNAKAR KAMATH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT SUDHA RATHNA OPPOSITE REGAL NXT ADI UDUPI, UDUPI - 576 103 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY G.., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHIEF ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY ZONE KR CIRCLE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION'LJLWDOO\ VLJQHG E\ 6+:(7+$ SHIMOGGA-577 202.5$*+$9(1'5$ /RFDWLRQ +,*+ &2857 2) .$51$7$.$ 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGH DIVISION SHRINGERI - 577 139. 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT UDUPI-576 101. 5. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ZILLA PANCHAYATH, RAJATADRI MANIPAL-576 104. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:35938 WP No. 31823 of 2025 HC-KAR 6. THE COMMISSIONER UDUPI TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ADI UDUPI, UDUPI-576 101. 7. THE COMMISSIONER UDUPI CITY MUNICIPALITY K.M.MARG, UDUPI - 576 101. 8. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDA DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 9. KRISHNA KOTIAN S/O THIMMAPPA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT THIMMAPPA HOTEL ADI UDUPI, UDUPI - 576 103. 10. PRASHANT SUVARNA S/O KESHAV SUVARNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT OPPOSITE REGAL NXT ADI UDUPI, UDUPI - 576 103 …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFAR SHAJ, AGA FOR R1 TO R4 AND R8: V/O DATED:24.11.2025 SRI. ASHOK N NAYAK.,ADVOCATE FOR R5: SRI K PRASAD HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R6: SRI T.I. ABDULLA, ADVOCATE FOR R7: SRI. NAGARAJ KRAPAKAR, HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R9 &R10) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAINING RESPONDENT NO. 9 AND 10 FROM PUTTING UP ANY CONSTRUCTION IN LAND AT SURVEY NO. 9/5 OF MOODANIDAMBURU VILLAGE, TALUK AND DISTRICT UDUPI, ABUTTING N.H. 169-A WITHIN THE PROHIBITORY DISTANCE OF 40 METERS FROM THE CENTER OF N.H. 169-A AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:35938 WP No. 31823 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: (a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ restraining Respondent No. 9 and 10 from putting up any in land at survey No. 9/5 of construction Moodanidamburu Village, Taluk and District Udupi, abutting N.H. 169-A within the prohibitory distance of 40 meters from WKH FHQWHU RI 1 Ƭ -Ƨ

(b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ directing the Respondent No.1 to 8 to consider the representation dated 25-08-2025, dated 17-09-2025 produced at Annexure J and K and the legal notice dated 24-09-2025 produced consequently restrain Respondent no. 9 and 10 from putting up construction in land at survey No. 9/5 of Moodanidamburu Village, Taluk and District Udupi at Annexure M. (c) Issue any other writ or directions to meet the ends of justice. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.7 may sanction a plan or consider an application filed by respondent Nos.9 and 10 without considering the representations of the petitioner dated 25.08.2025 and - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:35938 WP No. 31823 of 2025 HC-KAR 17.09.2025 at Annexures J and K, respectively, as also the legal notice dated 24.09.2025 at Annexure M. 3. The reason for the same is that, according to the petitioner, no construction can be carried out within the building line of the National Highway, and it is in that background that objections have been submitted by the petitioner. 4. At present the claim of the petitioner is hypothetical inasmuch as the application, if any filed by respondent Nos.9 and 10 is yet to be considered by respondent No.7. Hence, by directing respondent No.7 to consider the aforesaid representations of the petitioner while considering any application if filed by respondent Nos.9 and 10, the petition stands disposed.

5. Until grant of such permission by respondent No.7, respondent Nos.9 and 10 are restrained from putting up any construction or carrying out any construction in subject property. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57