Karnataka High Court
P Ashwatha Reddy v. Sri Ramappa
2026:KHC:35260 · RSA/298/2022
- Decision date
- 2026-07-10
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- V Srishananda
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:35260 RSA No. 298 of 2022 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: P ASHWATHA REDDY (DIED ON 18.03.2021) BY HIS LRS, 1. SMT P LAKSHMIDEVAMMA, W/O LATE. P. ASHWATHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS REDDICHERUPALLI VILLAGE, GORENTLA MANDALAM, HINDUPUR TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -515701 2. SRI. P RAMAKRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE. P ASHWATHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS REDDICHERUPALLI VILLAGE,Digitally signed by GORENTLA MANDALAM, MALATESH HINDUPUR TALUK, K C ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, Location: ANDHRA PRADESH -515701 HIGH COURT OF 3. SRI. P NARAYANA REDDYKARNATAKA S/O LATE P. ASHWATHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS REDDICHERUPALLI VILLAGE, GORENTLA MANDALAM, HINDUPUR TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -515 701 - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:35260 RSA No. 298 of 2022 HC-KAR 4. SMT. BHARATHI D/O LATE P. ASHWATHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS REDDICHERUPALLI VILLAGE, GORENTLA MANDALAM, HINDUPUR TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH – 515 701 5. SMT. PARVATHAMMA D/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS REDDICHERUPALLI VILLAGE, GORENTLA MANDALAM, HINDUPUR TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH – 515 701 6. SRI. VENKATA REDDY S/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS REDDICHERUPALLI VILLAGE, GORENTLA MANDALAM, HINDUPUR TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -515 701
7. SMT. NARAYANAMMA D/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS REDDICHERUPALLI VILLAGE, GORENTLA MANDALAM, HINDUPUR TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -515701 8. SRI. P SRIRAMA REDDY S/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS REDDICHERUPALLI VILLAGE, GORENTLA MANDALAM, - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:35260 RSA No. 298 of 2022 HC-KAR HINDUPUR TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 515701 9. SMT. P KALAVATHI D/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS REDDICHERUPALLI VILLAGE, GORENTLA MANDALAM, HINDUPUR TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH – 515 701 10. SRI. P SOMASHEKAR REDDY S/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS REDDICHERUPALLI VILLAGE, GORENTLA MANDALAM, HINDUPUR TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 515701 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ERAPPA REDDY M, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI RAMAPPA S/O. ADHIMURTHAPPA @ JEJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS R/AT GANTAMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, NEAR T B CROSS, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK -561207. 2. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA W/O RAMAPPA R/AT GANTAMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, NEAR T B CROSS, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK -561 207. - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:35260 RSA No. 298 of 2022 HC-KAR 3. SRI. VENKATASHIVA REDDY S/O. RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT GANTAMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, NEAR T B CROSS, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK - 561207. 4. SRI. MANJUNATH S/O. RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT GANTAMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, NEAR T B CROSS, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK – 561 207. 5. SRI. NARAYANAPPA S/O. ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
R/AT GANTAMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, NEAR T B CROSS, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK – 561 207. 6. SMT. K V ADEMMA W/O. K V NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT GANTAMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, NEAR T B CROSS, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK - 561207. 7. SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O. BYYAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT GANTAMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, NEAR T B CROSS, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK - 561207. 8. SMT. T N NAGARATHNAMMA W/O. VENKATARAMAPPA, - 5 - NC: 2026:KHC:35260 RSA No. 298 of 2022 HC-KAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO. 7TH BLOCK, BAGEPALLI TALUK -561207 9. SRI. V CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY S/O. VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS WELLCOME BAR, BAGEPALLI TOWN 561207 10. SRI. C JAYASIMHA REDDY S/O. LATE. CHINNAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS KONDAREDDIPALLI VILLAGE, BAGEPALLI TALUK - 561207 11. SRI. K NAGANANDA REDDY S/O. THIMMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT GANTAMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK - 561207. 12. SRI. RAJA REDDY S/O. VENKATARAMAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT GANTAMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK – 561 207. 13. SRI. VENKATA REDDY S/O. THIMMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT GANTAMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK – 561 207. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE - 6 - NC: 2026:KHC:35260 RSA No. 298 of 2022 HC-KAR DATED 21.06.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.224/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM.,
CHIKKABALLAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.10.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.47/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., BAGEPALLI. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Heard on I.A.No.1/2022. Same is filed to condone the huge delay of 2,004 days in filing the appeal. 2. First plaintiff - Ashwatha Reddy and remaining plaintiffs had filed a suit for partition and separate possession in respect of landed properties in O.S.No.47/2009. Suit on contest came to be dismissed. 3. Being aggrieved by the same, plaintiffs filed an appeal before the First Appellate Court in R.A.No.224/2011. 4. Learned Judge in the First Appellate Court after securing the records, heard the arguments of the parties re-appreciated the material on record and dismissed the appeal. The said judgment is dated 21.06.2014. - 7 - NC: 2026:KHC:35260 RSA No. 298 of 2022 HC-KAR 5. Thereafter, present second appeal came to be filed on 16.02.2022. 6. I.A.No.1/2022 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay in filing the appeal. Application is supported by affidavit of P. Ramakrishna Reddy -second appellant, who is one of the sons of P.Ashwatha Reddy, who was the first plaintiff.
7. In the affidavit it is contented that after filing the suit, appellant No.6 - Venkata Reddy who was the third plaintiff was looking after the matter and he did not intimate the result of the suit or the appeal in time so as to file the present second appeal. 8. Pertinently, Venkata Reddy is a party appellant in this appeal. 9. If it is the case of the appellants that Venkata Reddy is the person who is responsible for the delay in filing the appeal, he should have been assigned as a party/ defendant. 10. Nothing prevented the other appellants namely, Srirama Reddy or Somashekar Reddy or for that matter Ashvatha Reddy to find out what happened to contact their - 8 - NC: 2026:KHC:35260 RSA No. 298 of 2022 HC-KAR Advocate in the First Appellate Court and file the appeal in time. No such reasons are forthcoming. 11. At least the Affidavit of Venkata Reddy should have been there to the effect that he was in charge of the appeal and he did not know what to do after the First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal. 12. In the absence of such material evidence placed on record, huge delay of 2,004 days cannot be condoned as the reasons assigned in the affidavit are not sufficient enough to condone the delay. 13. Accordingly, the following: ORDER (i) I.A.No.1/2022 is dismissed. (ii) Consequently, appeal is also dismissed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32