Karnataka High Court
Sri. Doddasiddaiah v. Sri. Karisiddaiah
2026:KHC:34383 · RSA/68/2023
- Decision date
- 2026-07-08
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- V Srishananda
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:34383 RSA No. 68 of 2023 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. DODDASIDDAIAH S/O LATE SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 2. SRI SHIVASHANKAR S/O LATE SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 3. SMT. REVAMMA W/O LATE RAJAPPA @ SIDDARAJU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 4. SRI HARSHA KUMAR S/O LATE RAJAPPA @ SIDDARAJU Digitally AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS signed by BHARATHI S 5. MASTER MITHUNA RAJU Location: S/O LATE RAJAPPA @ SIDDARAJU HIGH AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS COURT OF KARNATAKA 6. MASTER JEEVAN KUMAR S/O LATE RAJAPPA @ SIDDARAJU AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS 5 & 6 SINCE MINORS REP BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. PALLAVI W/O SIDDARAJU - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:34383 RSA No. 68 of 2023 HC-KAR ALL ARE R/O CHATNAHALLI VILLAGE VARUNA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DIST - 570010 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MOHAN KUMAR T., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. KARISIDDAIAH S/O LATE SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS REP BY ITS PA HOLDER SRI SIDDARAJU S/O KARISIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/O CHATNAHALLI VILLAGE VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DIST - 570010 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIVEKANANDA T P., ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.11.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.8/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, ALLOWING THE
APPEALS AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.01.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.26/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:34383 RSA No. 68 of 2023 HC-KAR ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Sole respondent said to have died on 18.09.2025. Till today, no steps are taken to bring the legal representatives of deceased sole respondent on record. 2. As such, appeal stands dismissed as abated by operation of law. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE BS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16