- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:31027 WP No. 5778 of 2022 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 5778 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. M. MARIGOWDA S/O S. DODDAMARIGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY LRS 1. SMT. SUDHAMANI D/O LATE MARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2. PRAKASH M S/O LATE MARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 3. M NAGENDRA S/O LATE MARIGOWDA Digitally signed by AGED ABOUT 45 YEARSCHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 4. SMT. M. RADHA D/O LATE MARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL ARE R/A NERALAKERE VILLAGE ARAKERE HOBLI SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 438. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. MAHESHWARI M, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HARISH H.V, ADVOCATE) - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:31027 WP No. 5778 of 2022 HC-KAR AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA - 571 401. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PANDAVAPURA SUB DIVISION PANDAVAPURA - 571 434. 3. THE TAHSILDAR SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 438. 4. MAYIGOWDA S/O MAYIGOWDA SICE DEAD BY HIS LRS 4(A). SMT. NINGAMMA W/O LATE MAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT BETTAHALLI VILLAGE ARAKERE HOBLI, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. 4(B). MAHENDRA M S/O LATE MAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT BETTAHALLI VILLAGE ARAKERE HOBLI, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:31027 WP No. 5778 of 2022 HC-KAR 4(C). JAYAMMA W/O SIDDEGOWDA D/O LATE MAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

R/AT YACHANEHALLI BANNURU HOBI, T. NARASAPURA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT. 4(D). DEVAMMA W/O MAHADEVA D/O LATE MAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT DESHAVALLI, KIRIGAVALU HOBLI MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. 4(E). SIDDAMMA W/O NAGARAJU D/O LATE MAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT BANNAHALLI, ARAKERI HOBLI SRIRANGAPATTANA MANDYA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. S. ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4(A TO E)) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 20.02.2015 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT BANGALORE IN REVISION PETITION NO.31/2009 (MYSORE CAMP) VIDE ANNX-A, AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:31027 WP No. 5778 of 2022 HC-KAR THE REVISION PREFERRED BY THE R-4 BEFORE THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT BANGALORE IN REVISION PETITION NO.31/2009, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE W.P AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 20.02.2015 passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, (Annexure-A), remitting the matter to respondent No.3 to reconsider the issue afresh.

3. In that view of the matter and taking into consideration that the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal has considered the order dated 18.05.2009 passed in R.A.No.4/2002 on the file of respondent No.1 and has remitted the matter to the Tahsildar, Srirangapatna Taluk, - 5 - NC: 2026:KHC:31027 WP No. 5778 of 2022 HC-KAR Mandya District, for reconsidering the same. I am of the view that no interference be called for in this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60

- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:31027 WP No. 5778 of 2022 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 5778 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. M. MARIGOWDA S/O S. DODDAMARIGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY LRS 1. SMT. SUDHAMANI D/O LATE MARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2. PRAKASH M S/O LATE MARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 3. M NAGENDRA S/O LATE MARIGOWDA Digitally signed by AGED ABOUT 45 YEARSCHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 4. SMT. M. RADHA D/O LATE MARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL ARE R/A NERALAKERE VILLAGE ARAKERE HOBLI SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 438. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. MAHESHWARI M, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HARISH H.V, ADVOCATE) - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:31027 WP No. 5778 of 2022 HC-KAR AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA - 571 401. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PANDAVAPURA SUB DIVISION PANDAVAPURA - 571 434. 3. THE TAHSILDAR SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 438. 4. MAYIGOWDA S/O MAYIGOWDA SICE DEAD BY HIS LRS 4(A). SMT. NINGAMMA W/O LATE MAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT BETTAHALLI VILLAGE ARAKERE HOBLI, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. 4(B). MAHENDRA M S/O LATE MAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT BETTAHALLI VILLAGE ARAKERE HOBLI, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:31027 WP No. 5778 of 2022 HC-KAR 4(C). JAYAMMA W/O SIDDEGOWDA D/O LATE MAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

R/AT YACHANEHALLI BANNURU HOBI, T. NARASAPURA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT. 4(D). DEVAMMA W/O MAHADEVA D/O LATE MAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT DESHAVALLI, KIRIGAVALU HOBLI MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. 4(E). SIDDAMMA W/O NAGARAJU D/O LATE MAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT BANNAHALLI, ARAKERI HOBLI SRIRANGAPATTANA MANDYA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. S. ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4(A TO E)) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 20.02.2015 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT BANGALORE IN REVISION PETITION NO.31/2009 (MYSORE CAMP) VIDE ANNX-A, AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:31027 WP No. 5778 of 2022 HC-KAR THE REVISION PREFERRED BY THE R-4 BEFORE THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT BANGALORE IN REVISION PETITION NO.31/2009, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE W.P AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 20.02.2015 passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, (Annexure-A), remitting the matter to respondent No.3 to reconsider the issue afresh.

3. In that view of the matter and taking into consideration that the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal has considered the order dated 18.05.2009 passed in R.A.No.4/2002 on the file of respondent No.1 and has remitted the matter to the Tahsildar, Srirangapatna Taluk, - 5 - NC: 2026:KHC:31027 WP No. 5778 of 2022 HC-KAR Mandya District, for reconsidering the same. I am of the view that no interference be called for in this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60