- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:30389 WP No. 27204 of 2024 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 27204 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VARAMAHALAKSHMI WIFE OF LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING ATG NO. 46 KOLUR VILLAGE, RAMOHALLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE - 560 060. …PETITIONER (BY SRI: AKKI MANJUNATH GOWDA K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Digitally signed by SHWETHA VIDHANA SOUDHA RAGHAVENDRA BENGALURU - 560 001. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT BANGALORE - 560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: MOHAMMED JAFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 SRI: T P VIVEKANANDA, ADV FOR R2 & R3) - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:30389 WP No. 27204 of 2024 HC-KAR THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 23.09.2024 MADE BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND B AND ETC., THIS WP, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

"A) Issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 23.09.2024 made by the petitioner as per Anenxure-'A' & 'B', in the interest of justice and equity; B) Grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper and in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the proceedings to meet the ends of justice." 2. Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 has filed a memo on 24.03.2025, which reads as under: "The Respondents Respectfully submits as follows: - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:30389 WP No. 27204 of 2024 HC-KAR 1. Pursuant to the representation dated 23.09.2024 as per Annexure A & B the Principal City Civil & Session Judge has been requested to look into the grievance of the petitioner and submit a report. 2. The office of the Principal City Civil & Session Judge has submitted a report dated 28.11.2024, 16.12.2024 enclosing the action taken report from the respective presiding officers before whom the cases referred to in Annexures A & B are pending. 3. Since the Respondent's No.2 & 3 have already taken action in the administrative side, the petitioner may have to approach the respective courts for further course of action in the judicial side. WHEREFORE, the above writ petition may be dispose off taking note of reports produced along with this memo, in the interest of justice and equity."

3. The submission of learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 is that necessary action has been taken on the representation made by the petitioner and the security insofar as the property of the petitioner is concerned has been cancelled and further action is proposed to be taken against the imposters and the proceedings have been taken up against the imposters in a separate proceedings. 4. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the said submission answers the grievance of the petitioner. - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:30389 WP No. 27204 of 2024 HC-KAR 5. Placing the said submission on record, petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE BGN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43

- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:30389 WP No. 27204 of 2024 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 27204 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VARAMAHALAKSHMI WIFE OF LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING ATG NO. 46 KOLUR VILLAGE, RAMOHALLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE - 560 060. …PETITIONER (BY SRI: AKKI MANJUNATH GOWDA K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Digitally signed by SHWETHA VIDHANA SOUDHA RAGHAVENDRA BENGALURU - 560 001. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT BANGALORE - 560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: MOHAMMED JAFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 SRI: T P VIVEKANANDA, ADV FOR R2 & R3) - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:30389 WP No. 27204 of 2024 HC-KAR THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 23.09.2024 MADE BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND B AND ETC., THIS WP, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

"A) Issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 23.09.2024 made by the petitioner as per Anenxure-'A' & 'B', in the interest of justice and equity; B) Grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper and in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the proceedings to meet the ends of justice." 2. Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 has filed a memo on 24.03.2025, which reads as under: "The Respondents Respectfully submits as follows: - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:30389 WP No. 27204 of 2024 HC-KAR 1. Pursuant to the representation dated 23.09.2024 as per Annexure A & B the Principal City Civil & Session Judge has been requested to look into the grievance of the petitioner and submit a report. 2. The office of the Principal City Civil & Session Judge has submitted a report dated 28.11.2024, 16.12.2024 enclosing the action taken report from the respective presiding officers before whom the cases referred to in Annexures A & B are pending. 3. Since the Respondent's No.2 & 3 have already taken action in the administrative side, the petitioner may have to approach the respective courts for further course of action in the judicial side. WHEREFORE, the above writ petition may be dispose off taking note of reports produced along with this memo, in the interest of justice and equity."

3. The submission of learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 is that necessary action has been taken on the representation made by the petitioner and the security insofar as the property of the petitioner is concerned has been cancelled and further action is proposed to be taken against the imposters and the proceedings have been taken up against the imposters in a separate proceedings. 4. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the said submission answers the grievance of the petitioner. - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:30389 WP No. 27204 of 2024 HC-KAR 5. Placing the said submission on record, petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE BGN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43