Karnataka High Court
Canara Bank v. M/.s Rajesh Exports Limited
2026:KHC:29205 · WP/24649/2023
- Decision date
- 2026-06-16
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Jyoti M
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:29205 WP No. 24649 of 2023 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 24649 OF 2023 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: CANARA BANK, LARGE CORPORATE BRANCH, RAMANASHREE ARCADE, 3RD FLOOR, NO.18, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER, MR. SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEMANTH R.RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. RAJESH EXPORTS LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956, Digitally signed by HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT GEETHA P G NO.4, BATAVIA CHAMBERS, Location: HIGH COURT OF KUMARA KRUPA ROAD, KARNATAKA KUMARA PART EAST, BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MR. RAJESH J.MEHTA 2. MR. RAJESH J. MEHTA, S/O. JASWANTH RAI MEHTA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 578, 5TH MAIN, UPPER PALACE ORCHARDS, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU-560038. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:29205 WP No. 24649 of 2023 HC-KAR 3. MR. PRASHANT MEHTA, S/O. JASWANTH RAI MEHTA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 555, CHANDAN, 9TH 'A' MAIN ROAD, 1ST STAGE, INDIRANAGARA, BENGALURU-560038. 4. TAMIL NADU MERCANTILE BANK ABHINAYA THEATRE COMPLEX BASEMENT, 19F, BVK IYENGAR ROAD, BALEPETE, CHIKPETE, BENGALURU-560 009, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAGHU HULIKAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. RAGHU M., ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Hemanth R.Rao, counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Raghu Hulikal, counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri.Raghu M., counsel for respondent No.4 appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:29205 WP No. 24649 of 2023 HC-KAR withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14