Karnataka High Court
Sikandar Pasha v. The Karnataka State Board of Auqaf
2026:KHC:29029 · WP/4261/2022
- Decision date
- 2026-06-15
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- M. G. S. Kamal
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:29029 WP No. 4261 of 2022 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4261 OF 2022 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN: SIKANDAR PASHA, S/O SHEK ZAHIR AHMED, AGED 36 YEARS, R/AT GOVT. COLLEGE ROAD, NEAR NOOR MASJID, V.V.EXTENTION, HOSAKOTE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHIBOOB., ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AWQAF, SUMA B N DARUL AUQAF, NO.06, Location: CUNNINGHAM ROAD,HIGH COURT OF BANGALORE - 560 052. KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. JAMIA MASJID AHLE SUNNATHUL JAMATH, HOSAKOTE TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114 BY DISTRICT WAKF OFFICER, BANGALORE RURAL, - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:29029 WP No. 4261 of 2022 HC-KAR REPRESENTED BY ADMINISTRATOR CUM DISTRICT WAKF OFFICER, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. 3. ELECTION OFFICE, JAMIA MASJID AHLE SUNNATHUL, JAMATH, HOSAKOTE TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONDUCT ENQUIRY INTO THE IRREGULARITIES AND MISAPPROPRIATION COMMITTED BY THE PREVIOUS MANAGING COMMITTEE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER
On 08.06.2026 this Court passed the following order: "Order sheet indicate that there is consistent absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears, petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. However, in the interest of justice, matter is adjourned to 15.06.2026 on payment of cost of Rs.500/- payable to the Karnataka State Legal Services Committee. It is made clear that if there is no representation on the next date of hearing, appropriate orders including dismissal would be passed." - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:29029 WP No. 4261 of 2022 HC-KAR Even today, neither there is representation nor the cost has been paid. Petitioner seems to have lost interest in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8