- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:28898 WP No. 10284 of 2026 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 10284 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MK TRAVELS, A REGISTERED PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN BEARING REG. NO 29IZEPK0114C1ZR REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETORSHIP, MR. MUKESH KUMAR,S/O LIKHAMA RAM, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/@ NO. 48 PROPERTY,NO.121, KHATA NO.353, KOTHANUR, BENGALURU, RAMPURA VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, KARNATAKA-560077 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKASH B SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:Digitally signed by SHWETHA 1. NODAL CYBER CELL OFFICERRAGHAVENDRA CYBER CRIME DIVISION,CID HEADQUARTERS, Location: HIGH COURT OF CARLTON HOUSE, PALACE ROAD, KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001, KARNATAKA E-MAIL [email protected] 2. KARNATAKA BANK, REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER KARNATAKA BANK,BANASWADI BRANCH, D.NO.963, 6-AC,BANASWADI OUTER RING ROAD, HRBR LAYOUT, BLOCK-I,KALYAN NAGAR, BANASWADI,BANGALORE, KARNATAKA - 560 043 …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:28898 WP No. 10284 of 2026 HC-KAR (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 SRI. NITHIN CHANDRA .M., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2 BANK TO UNFREEZE THE CURRENT ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO USE AND OPERATE NO.0126202400002001,

BANK ITS HAVING IFSC ACCOUNT BEARING KARB0000126, MAINTAINED IN THE KARNATAKA BANK, BANASWADI BRANCH, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: "WHEREFORE, the Petitioner pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: I. Issue a direction to the Respondent No.2 Bank to unfreeze the Current account of the Petitioner and permit the Petitioner to use and operate No.0126202400002001, its bank having account bearing IFSC:KARB0000126, maintained in the Karnataka Bank, Banaswadi Branch, Bangalore, Karnataka. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:28898 WP No. 10284 of 2026 HC-KAR II. Grant such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity". 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though a lien to only an extent of Rs.94,118.93/- has been initiated against the account of the petitioner, the respondent bank has frozen the entire bank. As held by this Court in Sri.Madhu vs. The Indusind Bank Ltd represented by the Branch Manager1, the respondent - bank can only mark a lien and freeze the account only in respect of the order which have been received by them.

3. Admittedly, in the present matter, the lien is only to an extent of Rs.94,118.93/- only. Hence, the entire account could not have been frozen. 4. Hence, I pass the following: 1 W.P.NO.38362/2025 - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:28898 WP No. 10284 of 2026 HC-KAR ORDER (i) Writ Petition is allowed. (ii) Respondent No.2 - bank is permitted to mark lien only to an extent of Rs.94,118.93/- on the account of the petitioner and permit the petitioner to operate the account as regard to the balance amounts subject to the petitioner furnishing indemnity and such other documentation as required as security for the said amounts. (iii) Needless to say in the event of the respondent - bank receiving any further lien orders or frozen order, this order would not come in the way of respondent No.2 -bank enforcing the same. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE brn List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47

- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:28898 WP No. 10284 of 2026 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 10284 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MK TRAVELS, A REGISTERED PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN BEARING REG. NO 29IZEPK0114C1ZR REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETORSHIP, MR. MUKESH KUMAR,S/O LIKHAMA RAM, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/@ NO. 48 PROPERTY,NO.121, KHATA NO.353, KOTHANUR, BENGALURU, RAMPURA VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, KARNATAKA-560077 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKASH B SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:Digitally signed by SHWETHA 1. NODAL CYBER CELL OFFICERRAGHAVENDRA CYBER CRIME DIVISION,CID HEADQUARTERS, Location: HIGH COURT OF CARLTON HOUSE, PALACE ROAD, KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001, KARNATAKA E-MAIL [email protected] 2. KARNATAKA BANK, REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER KARNATAKA BANK,BANASWADI BRANCH, D.NO.963, 6-AC,BANASWADI OUTER RING ROAD, HRBR LAYOUT, BLOCK-I,KALYAN NAGAR, BANASWADI,BANGALORE, KARNATAKA - 560 043 …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:28898 WP No. 10284 of 2026 HC-KAR (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 SRI. NITHIN CHANDRA .M., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2 BANK TO UNFREEZE THE CURRENT ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO USE AND OPERATE NO.0126202400002001,

BANK ITS HAVING IFSC ACCOUNT BEARING KARB0000126, MAINTAINED IN THE KARNATAKA BANK, BANASWADI BRANCH, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: "WHEREFORE, the Petitioner pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: I. Issue a direction to the Respondent No.2 Bank to unfreeze the Current account of the Petitioner and permit the Petitioner to use and operate No.0126202400002001, its bank having account bearing IFSC:KARB0000126, maintained in the Karnataka Bank, Banaswadi Branch, Bangalore, Karnataka. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:28898 WP No. 10284 of 2026 HC-KAR II. Grant such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity". 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though a lien to only an extent of Rs.94,118.93/- has been initiated against the account of the petitioner, the respondent bank has frozen the entire bank. As held by this Court in Sri.Madhu vs. The Indusind Bank Ltd represented by the Branch Manager1, the respondent - bank can only mark a lien and freeze the account only in respect of the order which have been received by them.

3. Admittedly, in the present matter, the lien is only to an extent of Rs.94,118.93/- only. Hence, the entire account could not have been frozen. 4. Hence, I pass the following: 1 W.P.NO.38362/2025 - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:28898 WP No. 10284 of 2026 HC-KAR ORDER (i) Writ Petition is allowed. (ii) Respondent No.2 - bank is permitted to mark lien only to an extent of Rs.94,118.93/- on the account of the petitioner and permit the petitioner to operate the account as regard to the balance amounts subject to the petitioner furnishing indemnity and such other documentation as required as security for the said amounts. (iii) Needless to say in the event of the respondent - bank receiving any further lien orders or frozen order, this order would not come in the way of respondent No.2 -bank enforcing the same. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE brn List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47