- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:29007-DB WP No. 932 of 2024 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T WRIT PETITION NO.932 OF 2024 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI V.T. MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O. LATE SRI THAMMAIAH RESIDING AT NO.11 VEERASAGARA VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU-560 064. 2. SRI HARISH GOWDA V.R. S/O. LATE SRI RAMESH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.11 VEERASAGARA VILLAGE Digitally YELAHANKA HOBLIsigned by ANJALI M YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU-560 064.Location: High Court …PETITIONERS of (BY SRI CLIFTON D' ROZARIO, ADVOCATE) Karnataka AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARY DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:29007-DB WP No. 932 of 2024 HC-KAR 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH COMMISSIONER NO.20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-4 DR. SHIVARAM KARANTH LAYOUT BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NO.20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. HEMALATHA V., AGA FOR R-1; SRI SHIVAPRASAD M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 AND R-3) * * * THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO 1) ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE

WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION NO.BDA/DC(LA)/67/2022-23 DATED 19-8-2022 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE DATED 23-8-2022 (PLACED AS ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:29007-DB WP No. 932 of 2024 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The petitioners have challenged the notification seeking to acquire the lands of the petitioners and in the alternative have sought for compensation to be paid to them under the new Land Acquisition Act, 2013. On the earlier occasion, this Court had directed the petitioners to secure instructions as to whether the petitioners would be willing to take compensation in terms of the scheme i.e., 60:40 ratio, that is now determined for the purpose of grant of compensation in the lands that are acquired for the formation of Dr. Shivaram Karanth layout. 2. The learned counsel Sri. Clifton Rosario appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are ready and willing for taking compensation in terms of the scheme 60:40 ratio and the petitioners/parties, who are present before the Court also would submit the same.

3. In that light, we deem it appropriate to dispose the subject petition with a direction to the BDA to determine compensation in terms of the scheme 60:40 ratio, as is now determined to all lands that have become the subject matter of acquisition of Dr. Shivaram Karanth layout and disperse the - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:29007-DB WP No. 932 of 2024 HC-KAR same as expeditiously as possible. Insofar as the sites that are to be given to the land losers, the learned counsel for the petitioners' submit that they be considered for grant of sites in the vicinity of the remaining lands that are now acquired. 4. Learned counsel Sri. Shivaprasad M. Shantanagoudar representing respondent Nos.2 and 3/BDA would submit that a direction to consider a particular site would not be granted, but, in the nearest vicinity as far as possible, the BDA would consider the case of the petitioners and draw up a site accordingly. The said submission is placed on record. In the said circumstance, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the aforesaid directions. In view of disposal of the main petition, all pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE MN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11

- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:29007-DB WP No. 932 of 2024 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T WRIT PETITION NO.932 OF 2024 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI V.T. MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O. LATE SRI THAMMAIAH RESIDING AT NO.11 VEERASAGARA VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU-560 064. 2. SRI HARISH GOWDA V.R. S/O. LATE SRI RAMESH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.11 VEERASAGARA VILLAGE Digitally YELAHANKA HOBLIsigned by ANJALI M YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU-560 064.Location: High Court …PETITIONERS of (BY SRI CLIFTON D' ROZARIO, ADVOCATE) Karnataka AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARY DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:29007-DB WP No. 932 of 2024 HC-KAR 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH COMMISSIONER NO.20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-4 DR. SHIVARAM KARANTH LAYOUT BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NO.20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. HEMALATHA V., AGA FOR R-1; SRI SHIVAPRASAD M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 AND R-3) * * * THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO 1) ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE

WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION NO.BDA/DC(LA)/67/2022-23 DATED 19-8-2022 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE DATED 23-8-2022 (PLACED AS ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:29007-DB WP No. 932 of 2024 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The petitioners have challenged the notification seeking to acquire the lands of the petitioners and in the alternative have sought for compensation to be paid to them under the new Land Acquisition Act, 2013. On the earlier occasion, this Court had directed the petitioners to secure instructions as to whether the petitioners would be willing to take compensation in terms of the scheme i.e., 60:40 ratio, that is now determined for the purpose of grant of compensation in the lands that are acquired for the formation of Dr. Shivaram Karanth layout. 2. The learned counsel Sri. Clifton Rosario appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are ready and willing for taking compensation in terms of the scheme 60:40 ratio and the petitioners/parties, who are present before the Court also would submit the same.

3. In that light, we deem it appropriate to dispose the subject petition with a direction to the BDA to determine compensation in terms of the scheme 60:40 ratio, as is now determined to all lands that have become the subject matter of acquisition of Dr. Shivaram Karanth layout and disperse the - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:29007-DB WP No. 932 of 2024 HC-KAR same as expeditiously as possible. Insofar as the sites that are to be given to the land losers, the learned counsel for the petitioners' submit that they be considered for grant of sites in the vicinity of the remaining lands that are now acquired. 4. Learned counsel Sri. Shivaprasad M. Shantanagoudar representing respondent Nos.2 and 3/BDA would submit that a direction to consider a particular site would not be granted, but, in the nearest vicinity as far as possible, the BDA would consider the case of the petitioners and draw up a site accordingly. The said submission is placed on record. In the said circumstance, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the aforesaid directions. In view of disposal of the main petition, all pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE MN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11