Karnataka High Court
Sri Shivananjaiah v. State of Karnataka
2026:KHC:27376 · WP/11125/2025
- Decision date
- 2026-06-09
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- E. S. Indiresh
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:27376 WP No. 11125 of 2025 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.11125 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SHIVANANJAIAH S/O LATE KEMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572111. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHA KUMAR GOWDA H.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, Digitally signed by DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDI,CHAYA S A Location: HIGH BENGALURU-560001 COURT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR-572101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION, TUMKUR-572101. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:27376 WP No. 11125 of 2025 HC-KAR 4. THE TAHASILDAR, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572130. 5. REVENUE INSPECTOR AMRUTHUR HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 130. 6. SRI. S.K.NANJEGOWDA, S S/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572111. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 16.10.2024 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN PROCEEDINGS R.P. NO.123/2022 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-L; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:27376 WP No. 11125 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, stating that, parties have amicably settled the matter. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6