Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Hilal Ahmad Gilkar v. Vijay Kumar Dhar & Anr.

FAO/12/2023

Decision date
2026-09-07
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Sanjay Parihar

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

S. No. 42 Regular HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR FAO No. 12/2023 CM No. (3406/2023) Hilal Ahmad Gilkar …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. Vijay Kumar Dhar And Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Hakim Suhail Ishtiyaq, Advocate vice Mr. Sajad Ahmad Sofi, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 07.09.2026 1. On the last date of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the matter was called nobody turned up to represent the petitioner, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant matter any further. 2. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution along with all connected CMs. 3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 07.09.2026 Akhil Dev