Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Abdul Razaq Tantary v. Mohammad Yousuf Bhat

CM(M)/297/2026

Decision date
2026-07-21
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Rahul Bharti

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Serial No. 140 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) No. 297/2026 CM No. 4460/2026 Abdul Razaq Tantray …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Khursheed, Advocate Vs. Mohammad Yousuf Bhat ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 21.07.2026 1. Petitioner does not have the luxury of maintaining a supervisory petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India to assail cognizance taking order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Dangiwacha, Baramulla in a criminal complaint initiated by the respondent by reference to commission of offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as such this present petition is not entertained without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to opt for proper remedy enabling this Court to deal with ongoing criminal complaint which surely cannot be dealt with by this Court on the supervisory side jurisdiction under article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Dismissed as such along with connected CM. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 21.07.2026 Imtiyaz Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 27.07.2026 12:35