Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Parvaiz Ahmad Tantray v. Union Territory of J and K and and Another (Home)

WP(C)/1637/2026

Decision date
2026-07-14
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Rahul Bharti

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

141 Suppl- I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1637/2026. Parvaiz Ahmad Tantray. …Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Nida Nazir, Advocate. VERSUS Union Territory Of J & K & Another. …Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE. ORDER 14.07.2026 1. This Court disposes of this petition with a direction unto the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Baramulla to accord an expedited hearing to the petitioner’s pending bail petition whereby the petitioner is seeking bail on medical grounds which are said to be pressing in nature. 2. The delay in adjudication of said bail petition is reckoned to be rendering the petitioner’s health condition compromised in the sense that because of the pendency of said bail petition he is not in a position even to petition this Court for the purpose of seeking bail on medical ground. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Baramulla, to dispose of the petitioner’s pending bail petition, if any, on or before 10th of August, 2026. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 14.07.2026 Bisma Jan.