Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Mohd Sadiq v. Union Territory of J and K Th Revenue Deptt & Ors.

WP(C)/473/2020

Decision date
2026-07-13
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Sr. No. 18 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No.473/2020 Mohd. Sadiq …..Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Priyanshu Sharma, Advocate Vs Union Territory of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 13.07.2026 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the grievance raised in the present writ petition stands redressed. He further submits that, on instructions, he does not wish to press the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. His statement is taken on record. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, along with all connected CM(s), if any. 3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 13.07.2026 Shammi