Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Mohammad Subhan Yato v. Union Territory of J and K & Ors.

WP(C)/1289/2026

Decision date
2026-06-15
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Shahzad Azeem

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Serial No.42 Supplementary Cause List-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1289/2026 CM(3446/2026) Mohammad Subhan Yato. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. S. A. Qadri, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others. ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem, Judge. ORDER 15.06.2026 The subject matter of this petition is already pending disposal before the Executive Magistrate/Tehsildar, Chadoora, in terms of Section 270 of BNSS, however, without delineating any plausible reason to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, the instant petition is preferred. Nonetheless, keeping in view the nature of controversy involved, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executive Magistrate/Tehsildar, Chadoora to expedite the proceedings pending in file titled “Mohammad Shaban Yatoo & Anr. Vs Manzoor Ahmad Yatoo & Ors” under Section 270 of BNSS and decide the same within a period of three months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of along with connected CM in the manner indicated above. (Shahzad Azeem) Judge SRINAGAR: 15.06.2026 “Hamid” Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 16.06.2026