Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Naresh Nischal v. State of Jammu and Kashmir Th. Commissioner-Cum-Scretary, Home Department

CRMC/29/2019

Decision date
2026-02-27
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Sanjay Parihar

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Sr. No. 30 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CRMC No. 29/2019 c/w APPCR No. 4/2019 in CrlM No. 21/2019 Naresh Nischal …. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through:- Mr. R.K.S. Thakur, Advocate V/s State of J&K and others …..Respondent(s) Through:- None CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 27.02.2026 1. In this case, in terms of order dated 06.02.2026, the respondents were directed to place on record the latest status report regarding the complaint lodged by respondent No. 3 with the SHO, Police Station, Peer Mitha, Jammu on 26.06.2018, which was filed on 25.02.2025. From the status report, it transpires that the complainant had lodged a complaint before the SHO, Police Station, Peer Mitha, Jammu, but simultaneously appears to have also filed separate complaint before the Crime Branch, which the agency got enquired and found that the allegations were not proved and, accordingly, sent it for approval as not admitted, to the Crime Branch Headquarter, vide letter No. CHQ/Clt./J-101/2019/3172 dated 10.02.2022. Page 1 of 2 2. Given the latest status report, it appears that the complaint lodged by respondent No. 3 has been found not proved and not trustworthy for further investigation. 3. In that background, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is, therefore, dismissed. 4. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. ( SANJAY PARIHAR ) JUDGE JAMMU 27.02.2026 Nikhil Page 2 of 2 CRMC No. 29/2019

c/w APPCR No. 4/2019