Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Imtiaz Ahmed & Anr. v. UT of J and K Th Commissioner Secretary to Government Home Department, Jammu & Ors.

WP(C)/246/2026

Decision date
2026-02-09
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Sr. No. 137 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 246/2026 Imtiaz Ahmed and another …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Rohit Kumar Parihar, Advocate V/s UT of J&K and others …..Respondent(s) Through:- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 09.02.2026 1. The petitioners seek a direction to respondents 1 to 4 to provide them the police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from respondent Nos. 5 to 9. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and out of their free will they got married. Copy of Nikah Nama has been placed on record. They submit that since they have contracted the marriage against the wishes of respondent Nos. 5 to 9, as such, they are facing harassment at their hands. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and anr., 2006 (5) SCC 475, and submits that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. 3. Any person having attained the age of majority is entitled to contract the marriage as per his/her wishes and the police department is duty bound to protect the life and liberty, if approached. However, it 2 WP(C) No. 246/2026

appears that the petitioners have not ever approached the official respondents for their indulgence in the matter for providing protection to them. 4. In this view of the matter, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, by providing that the respondents 1 to 4 shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for providing them adequate security and to ensure that nobody interferes in their married life, if they approach them. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of their marriage. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE Jammu 09.02.2026 Vishal Khajuria