Jharkhand High Court

Pintu Dutta v. The State of Jharkhadn

2026:JHHC:27446 · Cr.M.P./2197/2026

Decision date
2026-09-11
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Anil Kumar Choudhary

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

( 2026:JHHC:27446 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2197 of 2026 ------ 1. Pintu Dutta, aged about 48 years, son of Late Kriti Bhushan Dutta, resident of village Bhilai Pahadi, P.O. & P.S. M.G.M., Town-Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand). 2. Sandeep Laha @ Sandip Kumar Laha @ Sandip Laha, aged about 30 years, son of Sri Jeewan Laha, resident of village Bhilai Pahadi, P.O. & P.S. M.G.M., Town-Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand). 3. Mrinal Kumar Dutta, aged about 52 years, son of Late Diwakar Dutta, resident of village Bhilai Pahadi, P.O. & P.S. M.G.M., Town-Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand). … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-04 Dated:-11-09-2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 03.12.2025.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 03.12.2025 by this Court. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence, the petitioner could not mark the list, hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner could not appear before this Court when the said Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 was called out, resulting in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 for non-prosecution. It is next submitted that non-prosecution before this Court on 03.12.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 11/09/2026 Abhiraj/