Jharkhand High Court
Milly Kumari Alias Mili Kumari v. The State of Jharkhand
2026:JHHC:27511 · A.B.A./4671/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-09-11
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
2026:JHHC:27511 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4671 of 2026 ---- Milly Kumari @ Mili Kumari, aged about 24 years, daughter of Arun Singh, resident of village – Ramkanali, PO – Katrasgarh, PS – Ramkanali, District – Dhanbad, Jharkhand, presently residing at Shyamdih, PO – Katras Bazar, PS – Katrasgarh, District – Dhanbad, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Achinto Sen, Advocate ---- 03/11.09.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barora P.S. Case No.20 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 108 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Dhanbad.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be wife of the deceased and the husband has committed suicide. He further submits that the deceased has committed suicide writing a note against the petitioner and he has shirked his responsibility as head of the family and only due to family dispute he has committed suicide. He then submits that even the mother-in-law of the petitioner has lodged the FIR only to deprive the petitioner of retiral benefits of the deceased. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. --1-- A.B.A. No.4671of2026 2026:JHHC:27511 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the complaint case was converted into FIR and now the case diary has been received and it has come that the petitioner was pressurizing the deceased to reside separately and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected.
5. The date of occurrence is said to be dated 04.11.2025 wherein the complaint case was lodged on 16.01.2026. On perusal of the said complaint case, it transpires that the said complaint is well drafted and even certain decisions have been cited and in that view of the matter things are required to be read in between the lines, however, the said complaint was further converted into FIR. Quarrel between the husband and wife is natural. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of her surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Dhanbad in connection with Barora P.S. Case No.20 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated11.09.2026 Sangam/ --2-- A.B.A. No.4671of2026