Jharkhand High Court
Raj Kumar v. State of Jharkhand
2026:JHHC:26007 · A.B.A./4914/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-08-29
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
2026:JHHC:26007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4914 of 2026 ------ Raj Kumar, aged 21 about years, son of Jitu Ram, resident of Subhash Nagar, P.O. Amlo, P.S. Bermo(Gandhinagar O.P.), District Bokaro, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P. ------ 02/29.08.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bermo (Gandhinagar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 303(2) and 62 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and the allegations are made that the motorcycle of the petitioner was found from the place of occurrence. He submits that even the theft of cable was not found and only allegation is made of destroying the cable. He further submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 12 of the petition. He next submits that the petitioner has also replied the notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the motorcycle of the petitioner was found from the place of occurrence. 5. Considering that the theft has not occurred and the motorcycle of the petitioner was alleged to be found there and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 12 of the petition and the petitioner has also replied the notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, in 2026:JHHC:26007 the attending facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Bermo (Gandhinagar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 29.08.2026 Anit Uploaded 31.08.2026