Jharkhand High Court

Rukhsar Parween Allias Raushan Parveen Allias Rakesh Praveen v. The State of Jharkhand

W.P.(Cr.)/243/2026

Decision date
2026-08-13
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 243 of 2026 --- Rukhsar Parween @ Ruksar Parveen @ Ruksar Praveen --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 3. The Director General of Police, DPRD Building, Jharkhand Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad. 5. Officer-in-Charge, Bhuli Police Station, Dhanbad.--- --- Respondents --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay --- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Talat Parween, Adv. For the State : A.C. to Sr. A.A.G. --- 05/13.08.2026 Heard Mrs. Talat Parween, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to Sr. A.A.G. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondent no.5 and other police officials from interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner. A further prayer has been made to pay exemplary compensation to the petitioner for the forcible entry into the house, breaking open of the main gate and causing damage to door, windows and other household articles.

A counter affidavit has been filed by the State from which it appears that though a warrant of arrest was received by the Bhuli O.P. on 13.01.2026, but subsequently on 31.03.2026 the said warrant was recalled. In view of the fact that the grievance of the petitioner seems to have been redressed as the warrant which was earlier issued, has been recalled, I am not inclined to proceed further in this writ application which accordingly stands disposed of. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Shamim/ Uploaded on : 14 /08/2026