Jharkhand High Court

Sahil Gope v. The State of Jharkhand

LPA/438/2026

Decision date
2026-08-13
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Rajesh Shankar

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

(2026: JHHC:24177-DB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 438 of 2026 1. Sahil Gope, aged about 18 years and 7 months, son of Ramesh Gope, resident of village Bujurg Jamira, P.O and P.S. Patratu, District Ramgarh (Jharkhand) ... ... ... ... ... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh, P.O., P.S. and District Ramgarh 3. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ramgarh, P.O., P.S. and District Ramgarh 4. Circle Officer, Patratu, P.O and P.S. Patratu, District Ramgarh 5. Somen Das Gupta, son of Manoranjan Das Gupta, resident of Village Bujurg Jamira, P.O and P.S. Patratu, District Ramgarh (Jharkhand) … … ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Appellant: Mr Rahul Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Resp.-State: Mrs Sunita Kumar, A.C to Sr. S.C-II For the Respondent No.5: Mr Vishal Kumar Rai, Advocate Mr Harsh Ladla, Advocate --------- 02 / Dated: 13.08.2026 I.A. No. 10593 of 2026 1. Learned counsel for the appellant and the 5th respondent jointly submit that they have settled the dispute amongst themselves and consequently, there is no surviving grievance between the parties in relation to the subject matter of this appeal. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant therefore submits that this appeal may now be disposed of. 3. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal. I.A. No. 10593 of 2026 is allowed and the pending I.As, if any, are also disposed of.

4. We have not seen any terms of the compromise and therefore, it is not as if we have put our seal or approval to such compromise. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) August 13, 2026 Ranjeet/R.Kr./Cp.2 NAFR Uploaded on 14.08.2026