Jharkhand High Court

Suraj Singh v. The State of Jharkhand

2026:JHHC:19115 · B.A./4195/2026

Decision date
2026-06-30
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Anil Kumar Choudhary

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

( 2026:JHHC:19115 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4195 of 2026 ------ Suraj Singh, aged about 24 years, s/o Mahendra Singh, R/o-Village Washri Colony, P.O.-Giddi, P.S.-Giddi (c), District-Hazaribagh (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Yash Raj Gupta, Advocate : Mr. LCN Shahdeo, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated- 30-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Charhi P.S. Case No. 118 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111(2)(b), 310(4), 310(5), 310(6) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 and 25(6) of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was preparing to commit dacoity and he is a member of an organized gang of criminals namely Pandey Gang. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.12.2025 as mentioned in para-22 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 14.05.2026 in B.A. No.4094 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Charhi P.S. Case No. 118 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 30/06/2026 Abhiraj/