Jharkhand High Court

Md. Arbaj v. The State of Jharkhand

2026:JHHC:18440 · B.A./5691/2026

Decision date
2026-06-24
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Anil Kumar Choudhary

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

( 2026:JHHC:18440 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5691 of 2026 ------ Md. Arbaj, aged about 26 years, s/o Md. Jasim, resident of Village-Kalal Toli, Jori, P.O. & P.S.-Basistha Nagar, Dist.-Chatra … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kr. Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Basistha Nagar P.S. Case No.45 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1)/61(2) (a) of the B.N.S., 2023.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the deceased died of consumption of heavy amount of brown sugar. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and admittedly the deceased voluntarily took brown sugar which is also known as Heroin. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.08 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.03.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 04 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 22.06.2026 in B.A. No.5545 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Chatra, in connection with Basistha Nagar P.S. Case No.45 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 24.06.2026 Gunjan-