Jharkhand High Court

Nitish Yadav @ Nitish Kumar Yadav @ Nitish Kumar v. The State of Jharkhand

2026:JHHC:16828 · B.A./5105/2026

Decision date
2026-06-11
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Anil Kumar Choudhary

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

[2026:JHHC:16828] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5105 of 2026 ------ Nitish Yadav @ Nitish Kumar Yadav @ Nitish Kumar, aged about 22 years, son of Sakaldev Yadav, resident of Pandey Barwa, P.O. and P.S. Barwadda, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-11-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.49 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 115 (2), 117 (2), 109 (1), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant namely Pintu Kumar Yadav by pelting stones upon him causing injuries on his hand. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-10 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that no sharp cutting weapon was used in the alleged occurrence. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.49 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-11.06.2026-Animesh/