IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 16188 of 2026. Decided on : 17th September , 2026 Pawana Devi ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Varun Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of defective pleadings, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law. Granting the permission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 17th September, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 16188 of 2026. Decided on : 17th September , 2026 Pawana Devi ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Varun Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of defective pleadings, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law. Granting the permission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 17th September, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?