2026:HHC:39790 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1156 of 2026 Decided on: 17th September, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Sanjeev Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2-State. Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.3 has produced a copy of office order dated 09.09.2026, passed by the Senior Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Nahan, which is taken on record. 2. A perusal of the same reveals that the petitioner has been granted the work charge status on notional basis w.e.f. 01.01.2006 and further his pay has been re-fixed. 3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 02.01.2026, passed in CWP No.21213 of 2025, titled, Sanjeev Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has duly been complied with, the execution petition is disposed of as having been fully satisfied. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

17th September, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge

2026:HHC:39790 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1156 of 2026 Decided on: 17th September, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Sanjeev Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2-State. Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.3 has produced a copy of office order dated 09.09.2026, passed by the Senior Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Nahan, which is taken on record. 2. A perusal of the same reveals that the petitioner has been granted the work charge status on notional basis w.e.f. 01.01.2006 and further his pay has been re-fixed. 3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 02.01.2026, passed in CWP No.21213 of 2025, titled, Sanjeev Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has duly been complied with, the execution petition is disposed of as having been fully satisfied. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

17th September, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge