Sanjeev Kumar Garg vs Chetan Chauhan Cr. Appeal No. 342 of 2015 17.09.2026 Present: None for the appellant. Ms. Bhagya Rani, Advocate, for the respondent. Perusal of the record reveals that on 22.05.2026, neither the appellant appeared nor any representation was made on his behalf. Consequently, this Court issued a notice to the appellant, which was duly served through his son for 17.07.2026. On 17.07.2026, there was again no appearance or representation on behalf of the appellant. Today, when the matter was called repeatedly, none appeared for the appellant, nor any representation has been made on his behalf. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 17.09.2026 (ravinder)

Sanjeev Kumar Garg vs Chetan Chauhan Cr. Appeal No. 342 of 2015 17.09.2026 Present: None for the appellant. Ms. Bhagya Rani, Advocate, for the respondent. Perusal of the record reveals that on 22.05.2026, neither the appellant appeared nor any representation was made on his behalf. Consequently, this Court issued a notice to the appellant, which was duly served through his son for 17.07.2026. On 17.07.2026, there was again no appearance or representation on behalf of the appellant. Today, when the matter was called repeatedly, none appeared for the appellant, nor any representation has been made on his behalf. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 17.09.2026 (ravinder)