IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 528 of 2026 Date of Decision : 20.8.2026 Vinod Thakur & anr. ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & ors .....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioners : Mr. Bhanu Verma, Advocate. For respondents No.1 and : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate 2/State General. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Rajat Thakur, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) It has been submitted that cancellation report was .led in the present petition which has been accepted by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 12.8.2026, passed in C.R. No. 18 of 2024. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand(s) disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 20th August, 2026 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 528 of 2026 Date of Decision : 20.8.2026 Vinod Thakur & anr. ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & ors .....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioners : Mr. Bhanu Verma, Advocate. For respondents No.1 and : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate 2/State General. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Rajat Thakur, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) It has been submitted that cancellation report was .led in the present petition which has been accepted by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 12.8.2026, passed in C.R. No. 18 of 2024. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand(s) disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 20th August, 2026 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.