1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.922 of 2026 Decided on: 17.08.2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------Rahul Sharma …..Petitioner Versus Ashish Kumar Kohli .....Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Pranav Thakur, Advocate vice Mr.Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. -------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record consideration order dated 17.08.2026 passed in the case of the petitioner towards implementation of judgment. 2. Taking note of the above, the present proceedings are closed with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievance, if any, in accordance with law at an appropriate stage if necessity so arises, in future. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 17, 2026 Judge yogesh 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.922 of 2026 Decided on: 17.08.2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------Rahul Sharma …..Petitioner Versus Ashish Kumar Kohli .....Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Pranav Thakur, Advocate vice Mr.Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. -------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record consideration order dated 17.08.2026 passed in the case of the petitioner towards implementation of judgment. 2. Taking note of the above, the present proceedings are closed with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievance, if any, in accordance with law at an appropriate stage if necessity so arises, in future. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 17, 2026 Judge yogesh 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.