IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.842 of 2026 Decided on: 12.08.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Ravi Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Er.Anju Sharma . …Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. A.K.Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 11.08.2026 from the Executive Engineer, Jal Shakti Division, Thural, alongwith consideration order dated 20.07.2026, deciding the case of the petitioner. 2. Taking note of above documents, these contempt proceedings are closed. Notice issued to the respondent is 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - discharged. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge August 12, 2026 R.Atal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.842 of 2026 Decided on: 12.08.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Ravi Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Er.Anju Sharma . …Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. A.K.Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 11.08.2026 from the Executive Engineer, Jal Shakti Division, Thural, alongwith consideration order dated 20.07.2026, deciding the case of the petitioner. 2. Taking note of above documents, these contempt proceedings are closed. Notice issued to the respondent is 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - discharged. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge August 12, 2026 R.Atal