IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 13266 of 2026 Decided on: 06.08.2026 Khem Raj … Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation and Others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?8 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, learned Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representation (Annexure P-8) filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of 12 weeks from today in terms of the contents therein. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 06, 2026 (Rishi) 8 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 13266 of 2026 Decided on: 06.08.2026 Khem Raj … Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation and Others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?8 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, learned Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representation (Annexure P-8) filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of 12 weeks from today in terms of the contents therein. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 06, 2026 (Rishi) 8 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?