IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 6700 of 2026. Decided on : 4 th August, 2026. Narinder Kumar Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus The M.D., Himachal Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that on account of subsequent developments, the petitioner be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to (le fresh petition on the same cause of action. 2. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 4th August, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 6700 of 2026. Decided on : 4 th August, 2026. Narinder Kumar Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus The M.D., Himachal Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that on account of subsequent developments, the petitioner be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to (le fresh petition on the same cause of action. 2. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 4th August, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?