2026:HHC:32346 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13163 of 2026 Decided on: 04.08.2026 Munish Kumar … Petitioner Versus HIMFED, near Victory Tunnel, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Umesh Kanwar, learned Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. In light of the fact that the petitioner has already completed his normal tenure at Sujanpur, as submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation that has been filed by the petitioner be decided forthwith and positively within a period of two weeks from today. His disability be taken into consideration by the Authority while deciding the representation. Personal hearing be also given to the petitioner. Till then, the petitioner shall not be forced to join the station to which he stands transferred, and he can avail the kind of leave due to him. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 04, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2026:HHC:32346 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13163 of 2026 Decided on: 04.08.2026 Munish Kumar … Petitioner Versus HIMFED, near Victory Tunnel, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Umesh Kanwar, learned Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. In light of the fact that the petitioner has already completed his normal tenure at Sujanpur, as submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation that has been filed by the petitioner be decided forthwith and positively within a period of two weeks from today. His disability be taken into consideration by the Authority while deciding the representation. Personal hearing be also given to the petitioner. Till then, the petitioner shall not be forced to join the station to which he stands transferred, and he can avail the kind of leave due to him. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 04, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?