IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.913 of 2026 Date of decision:31.07.2026 Roshan Lal ...Petitioner Versus Er. Anju Sharma ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral): The present petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 1415 of 2026 on 24.02.2026. 2. This Court had issued notice to the respondent on 27.07.2026, whereby learned Additional Advocate General was directed to have current instructions in the matter. 3. Today, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the office order dated 14.07.2026, whereby the representation of the present petitioner has been considered and rejected. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 4. Faced with the situation, learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that he will assail the said order before the competent Court of law and as such, the present petition can be closed. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is closed and disposed of as such. Notice discharged (Romesh Verma) Judge 31st July, 2026. (vt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.913 of 2026 Date of decision:31.07.2026 Roshan Lal ...Petitioner Versus Er. Anju Sharma ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral): The present petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 1415 of 2026 on 24.02.2026. 2. This Court had issued notice to the respondent on 27.07.2026, whereby learned Additional Advocate General was directed to have current instructions in the matter. 3. Today, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the office order dated 14.07.2026, whereby the representation of the present petitioner has been considered and rejected. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 4. Faced with the situation, learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that he will assail the said order before the competent Court of law and as such, the present petition can be closed. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is closed and disposed of as such. Notice discharged (Romesh Verma) Judge 31st July, 2026. (vt)