IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 10684 of 2026. Decided on :29 th July , 2026. Rakesh Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar University & Anr. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Anuj Gupta and Mr. Surjeet Kumar, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also, the pending applications, if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 29th July, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 10684 of 2026. Decided on :29 th July , 2026. Rakesh Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar University & Anr. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Anuj Gupta and Mr. Surjeet Kumar, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also, the pending applications, if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 29th July, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?