LAC & Ors. Vs. Bhagat Ram (deceased) through LRs & Ors. CMP No. 18704/2026 in RFA No. 38/2016 29.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the non-applicants/appellants. Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents. The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicants/respondents No. 3 & 4, for release of the compensation amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned Deputy Advocate General for the non-applicants/appellants has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as SLP filed against the judgment passed by this Court has been dismissed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants, coupled with the fact that SLP filed against the judgment passed by this Court has been dismissed, the same is allowed and the amount of compensation, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to ….2…. be released in favour of applicants/respondents No. 3 & 4, as per their respective shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in para-6 of the application. The application stands disposed of.

( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 29th July, 2026 (raman)

LAC & Ors. Vs. Bhagat Ram (deceased) through LRs & Ors. CMP No. 18704/2026 in RFA No. 38/2016 29.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the non-applicants/appellants. Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents. The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicants/respondents No. 3 & 4, for release of the compensation amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned Deputy Advocate General for the non-applicants/appellants has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as SLP filed against the judgment passed by this Court has been dismissed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants, coupled with the fact that SLP filed against the judgment passed by this Court has been dismissed, the same is allowed and the amount of compensation, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to ….2…. be released in favour of applicants/respondents No. 3 & 4, as per their respective shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in para-6 of the application. The application stands disposed of.

( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 29th July, 2026 (raman)