IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.843 of 2026 Date of decision:24.07.2026 Narender Singh ...Petitioner Versus Ajay Sharma ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr.A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral): The present petition has been filed alleging defiance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No.1345 of 2026, dated 24.02.2026. 2. The matter was listed before this court on 20.07.2026 and 21.07.2026 and on the said date, the learned Additional Advocate General sought time to have the instructions in this matter. 3. The learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the office order dated 22.07.2026, whereby the case of the present petitioner has been allowed. Therefore, the grievances of the present petitioner stand redressed. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 4. Faced with this situation, the learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition can be disposed of. 5. Consequently, the present petition is ordered to be closed as having been fully satisfied. Notice discharged. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Romesh Verma) Judge 24th July, 2026. (vt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.843 of 2026 Date of decision:24.07.2026 Narender Singh ...Petitioner Versus Ajay Sharma ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr.A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral): The present petition has been filed alleging defiance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No.1345 of 2026, dated 24.02.2026. 2. The matter was listed before this court on 20.07.2026 and 21.07.2026 and on the said date, the learned Additional Advocate General sought time to have the instructions in this matter. 3. The learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the office order dated 22.07.2026, whereby the case of the present petitioner has been allowed. Therefore, the grievances of the present petitioner stand redressed. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 4. Faced with this situation, the learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition can be disposed of. 5. Consequently, the present petition is ordered to be closed as having been fully satisfied. Notice discharged. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Romesh Verma) Judge 24th July, 2026. (vt)