NHAI vs. Premi Devi & another OMP(M) No.102 of 2026 20.07.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant. None for the respondents. OMP(M) No.102 of 2026 Notices were issued for the service of respondents on 22.05.2026. As per report of the Registry, the respondents have been duly served. However, none has appeared on their behalf. Hence, they are proceeded against ex parte. The present application has been filed for condonation of 391 days’ delay in filing the present appeal. It has been averred that the impugned judgment was passed by learned District Judge on 02.12.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant had applied for certified copy of impugned judgment on 11.03.2025 and the same was delivered on 07.05.2025. However, the disposal of the case was not within the knowledge of the applicant as the same was never intimated to the applicant by its counsel.

Earlier also, due to inefficiency and lackadaisical attitude of the law firm, namely, M/s M.V. Kini & Co., cases were withdrawn from the law firm vide letters dated 20.09.2023 and 26.03.2024. On Closing of the financial year, the applicant inquired from the law firm about the pendency of the cases in various Forums, and it is only then, it came to the knowledge of the applicant that the objection petitions pertaining to Mohal Padgal were disposed of. Due to the failure of the counsel/ law firm to apprise the status of these cases decided by the court below, there has been a delay in filing the appeal. Therefore, it has been prayed that the delay in filing the appeal is neither intentional nor willful, but the same has occurred due to unavoidable circumstances. Consequently, in view of the averments as made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit and in view of submissions as made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present application is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. Arb. Appeal No._______ of 2026 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. Send for records. Issue post admission notice to the respondents, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within three days. List in due course. OMP No.________ of 2026 Be registered. Heard

Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount along with up-to-date interest by the appellant/applicant within a period of eight weeks from today, the operation, implementation and execution of impugned judgment dated 02.12.2024, as passed by learned District Judge, Mandi as well as arbitral award dated 05.04.2023 during the pendency of appeal is ordered to be stayed. Application stands disposed of. ( Romesh Verma ) Judge July 20, 2026 (vt)

NHAI vs. Premi Devi & another OMP(M) No.102 of 2026 20.07.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant. None for the respondents. OMP(M) No.102 of 2026 Notices were issued for the service of respondents on 22.05.2026. As per report of the Registry, the respondents have been duly served. However, none has appeared on their behalf. Hence, they are proceeded against ex parte. The present application has been filed for condonation of 391 days’ delay in filing the present appeal. It has been averred that the impugned judgment was passed by learned District Judge on 02.12.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant had applied for certified copy of impugned judgment on 11.03.2025 and the same was delivered on 07.05.2025. However, the disposal of the case was not within the knowledge of the applicant as the same was never intimated to the applicant by its counsel.

Earlier also, due to inefficiency and lackadaisical attitude of the law firm, namely, M/s M.V. Kini & Co., cases were withdrawn from the law firm vide letters dated 20.09.2023 and 26.03.2024. On Closing of the financial year, the applicant inquired from the law firm about the pendency of the cases in various Forums, and it is only then, it came to the knowledge of the applicant that the objection petitions pertaining to Mohal Padgal were disposed of. Due to the failure of the counsel/ law firm to apprise the status of these cases decided by the court below, there has been a delay in filing the appeal. Therefore, it has been prayed that the delay in filing the appeal is neither intentional nor willful, but the same has occurred due to unavoidable circumstances. Consequently, in view of the averments as made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit and in view of submissions as made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present application is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. Arb. Appeal No._______ of 2026 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. Send for records. Issue post admission notice to the respondents, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within three days. List in due course. OMP No.________ of 2026 Be registered. Heard

Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount along with up-to-date interest by the appellant/applicant within a period of eight weeks from today, the operation, implementation and execution of impugned judgment dated 02.12.2024, as passed by learned District Judge, Mandi as well as arbitral award dated 05.04.2023 during the pendency of appeal is ordered to be stayed. Application stands disposed of. ( Romesh Verma ) Judge July 20, 2026 (vt)